A passionate journalist with about a decade of experience, Pooja has developed a strong hold on the UK grocery retail sector. From exploring legislative changes, supply chain shifts, consumer buying habits, trends to retail crime, her work is driven by a deep belief in investigating, finding the truth and telling authentic unbiased stories.
Be it convenience pathbreakers, wholesale trendsetters or Post Office Horizon scandal victims, Pooja has an equal flair for deciphering industries as well as human complexities. At Asian Trader, she aims to bridge the gap between policy, trade, and the shop floor, always keeping a finger on the pulse of what matters most to retailers.
Tobacco and Vape Bill is “highly confusing, unenforceable and unfair”, feel independent retailers who are calling on the government to take better and uncomplicated ways forward like simply raising the legal buying age and licensing of tobacco-selling shops.
Most independent retailers feel Tobacco and Vapes Bill, if it comes into effect, will have profound consequences and long-term deep impact on businesses as the stores will be exposed to confusing legal hassles as well as public anger.
Under current law, it is illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to buy tobacco products, but under the new Tobacco and Vapes Bill, children who are turning 15 this year, or anyone younger, would never be able to legally buy tobacco as the bill would make it an offence anywhere in the UK to sell tobacco products to anyone born on or after Jan 1 2009.
Backers of the legislation, including Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, say the aim is to create the UK's "first smoke-free generation."
The Smokefree Generation policy will come into force in 2027 when current 15-year-olds turn 18. In other words, post 2027, the age of sale will have to be raised by one year each year to prevent future generations from ever taking up smoking.
Superficially, the bill sounds like a perfect plan, but it has confusing layers and is expected to become a huge challenge for local stores with limited means, a major share of whose footfall and sales come from this category.
Unenforceable
Independent retailers are clueless at the moment at how they are going to enforce this regulation (if they have to), thanks to its sheer confusing and constantly-shifting timelines.
Owner of BB Nevison Superstore and Post Office in Pontefract, retailer Bobby Singh, feels that the legislation is “not practical and is totally unfair”.
“I personally do not smoke and feel education is the key to health awareness,” he told Asian Trader.
Scotland-based retailer Girish Jeeva who runs two stores around Glasgow, said, “I am not sure how the system will be placed and how difficult it will be when it comes to selling tobacco products. It seems unfair and very complicated.”
Retailer Nishi Patel, owner of Dartford’s Londis Bexley Park store, said, “I am a third generation shopkeeper. We always had tobacco products in the store. It's like cornerstone of a corner shop.
“Honestly, at the moment, we don't really know how we're going to implement this new law. I am not sure if the government is going to support us or give us grants for any age-recognition software.
“A lot of retailers are not happy with this bill because it is complicated and does not help us in any way at all.
Retailer Nishi Patel
“I am young so I will eventually work it out and get my staff trained to allow us to be able to enforce it. But I know a lot of other elderly shopkeepers who are saying that they will be forced to sell their businesses because it is too much legislation complexity for them to handle,” he told Asian Trader.
The bill will see that post-2027, every year, the legal minimum age of buying tobacco will be raised by one year, implying a few years down the line, a retailer and his staff will be held responsible if he is not able to prohibit sales to 36-year-olds while granting the same to 37-year-olds, thus creating a breeding ground for conflict with customers.
Stores are already reeling under record crime rates and abuse levels, as reflected by wider industry reports. The 2024 Crime Report by Association of Convenience Stores (ACS), released in early March revealed that an overwhelming majority (87 per cent) of people working in convenience stores have faced verbal abuse over the last year with "enforcing the law on age restricted sales” as top triggers for abuse.
The proposed legislation of generational smoking ban will further require retailers to decline sales to otherwise some fully-grown adults (but who can buy alcohol!), thus creating conflicting situations.
Retailer Eugene Diamond, owner of Diamond’s in Ballymena, said, “I asked a youngster to behave in the shop yesterday afternoon he’d been lifting and throwing products. His language and thoughts about me in reply was unbelievable. I can’t imagine what his reaction will be when he is 20 and refused cigarettes. I see that as a big problem.”
Patel too expects steep rise in cases of conflict and abuse from shoppers.
He said, “We are going to probably have increased problems in the shop from antisocial behavior. There is a cliché too that we talked about in Parliament too that someone could be born on the last month of December 2008 and his friend is just a month younger as he is born in January 2009. In this case, former would be able to buy tobacco while his friend would not!
“We are definitely going to have ugly issues in store as we are the ones who would be facing the shoppers and denying them sales, thus facing their rage and not the government,” he told Asian Trader.
Black market and loophole
Sadly, illegal trade of cigarettes and tobacco products is not new in the country. The trade, its logistics and supply chain exist and is flourishing already, as reflected by regular media and councils’ reports. Such a ban will only further boost underground trade.
Association of Convenience Stores chief James Lowman also stated that rogue sellers, who are supplying dodgy products to anyone who wants them, are operating without fear of reproach from Trading Standards teams that are already stretched beyond their limits.
“What we need is a coherent strategy focused on enforcing the rules that we already have and providing enforcement teams with enough resources to be able to do their jobs properly. New regulations that only affect responsible retailers will do nothing to deter the criminals that are importing and selling illicit products,” he said.
Retailer Patel feels the new legislation is more like a self-sabotage.
He said, “The government is going to lose out on revenue that tobacco makes. However, the market will be pushed into the black market more than it ever has been and the government is not going to get any revenue from there.
“Since tobacco sales will go down every passing year, money generated from tobacco will also go down. It looks like the government is putting themselves in a really big hole. The illicit trade is going to go up, which means they're not getting the taxes from it.”
iStock image
What about the retailers buying tobacco from wholesalers for their stores? What rules will apply to them?
Sometime in future, let’s say in 2040, can a retailer (born after 2009) buy cigarettes and tobacco to stock in his store for his client base (pre-existing smokers born before 2009) or will the wholesaler be criminalised in this scenario?
Federation of Wholesale Distributors (FWD) is seeking clarity from the government and is yet to hear on this matter.
James Bielby, Chief Executive of FWD, said, “There must be an exemption to allow retailers to purchase tobacco from their wholesalers, whatever their age. There is a precedent for a wholesale exemption on displays and packaging – both of which are permitted in wholesale depots. These successes on tobacco policy, won by FWD, need to be replicated in the legislation.”
The wholesale body is also concerned over potential increase in the illicit trade.
“This policy must not lead to an increase in the illicit market controlled by organised crime gangs, hitting our members’ legitimate sales, tax revenues, and driving unregulated youth access to tobacco,” he added.
Better ways forward
Anti-smoking rules in the UK are among Europe’s strictest, with only Sweden having tougher regulations. The country already has the continent’s second-lowest smoking rates owing to some of the toughest laws and highest taxes on cigarettes in Europe and it has been slowly winning the war over smoking organically with the correct shift in mindset.
Based on APS data, the proportion of smokers in the UK in 2022 was 12.9 per cent, or 6.4 million people. This is a decrease from 2021 (13.3 per cent) and a considerable decrease in current smokers compared with 2011 (20.2 per cent). Comparing with peers, in France and Germany, smoking rate is 33.4 per cent and 22 per cent, while in Bulgaria, it is 39 per cent.
Demand for cigarettes fell by 54.3 per cent between 2010 from 38.3 packs/capita and 2022 to 17 packs/capita, according to analysis Smokefree World based on annual Population Survey data from the Office for National Statistics.
So, the question arises is do we even need a ban of such complexity and scale?
Retailer Patel feels that Sunak is seemingly only focused to be “remembered for bringing in generational smoking ban and thus saving future of the UK from cigarettes”.
iStock image
“Truth is some people are still going to smoke; there is no way that a whole generation cannot be smoking. He (Sunak) is not being practical. And as a human, we don't make choices for people who are old enough to make their own decisions. This generational smoking ban is nothing but just another red tape that we're going to deal with,” the retailer said.
New Zealand, whose policy reportedly inspired Sunak to introduce similar smoking restrictions in the UK, has scrapped its landmark smoking in November last year, even before it fully came into effect. Scrapping the plan, New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon stated that the ban would have created "an opportunity for a black market to emerge, which would be largely untaxed.
Many retailers also believe that the government does not have the required funding or resources to police a generational ban of such a scale.
Retailers are calling on the government to consider better ways forward like increasing the legal age and licensing the tobacco shops.
Patel added, “Why don't they move the age of smoking to 21? And why don't they license every tobacco shop? That way, they cans still generate some money as well as some control on the market and a check on underage sales. Instead of doing a complete blanket ban, the government is bringing this generational thing which is so confusing.
“Training standards are already under massive budgetary crisis, they don't have enough money nor people on the floor to check each shop. Whereas if they license tobacco-selling shops, they will have some funds to go into the Trading Standards.”
The idea that one should not smoke, or smoking is injurious, should be inculcated at home, school and in society and not from a neighborhood shop owner. It seems like government, authorities, charities, schools and even parents are somewhere failing to bring awareness in young people and are trying to pass the buck on stores through this confusing law, disproportionately criminalising them in the process.
Clearly, the onus of making the UK “smoke-free” seems to be unfairly falling entirely and solely on the shoulders of retailers!
Chewing gum releases hundreds of tiny plastic pieces straight into people's mouths, researchers said on Tuesday, also warning of the pollution created by the rubber-based sweet.
The small study comes as researchers have increasingly been finding small shards of plastic called microplastics throughout the world, from the tops of mountains to the bottom of the ocean - and even in the air we breathe.
They have also discovered microplastics riddled throughout human bodies - including inside our lungs, blood and brains - sparking fears about the potential effect this could be having on health.
"I don't want to alarm people," Sanjay Mohanty, the lead researcher behind the new study which has not yet been peer-reviewed, told AFP.
There is no evidence directly showing that microplastics are harmful to human health, said Mohanty of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
The pilot study instead sought to illustrate yet another little-researched way that these mostly invisible plastic pieces enter our bodies - chewing gum.
Lisa Lowe, a PhD student at UCLA, chewed seven pieces each of 10 brands of gum, before the researchers then ran a chemical analysis on her saliva.
They found that a gram (0.04 ounces) of gum released an average of 100 microplastic fragments, though some shed more than 600. The average weight of a stick of gum is around 1.5 grams.
People who chew around 180 pieces of gum a year could be ingesting roughly 30,000 microplastics, the researchers said.
This pales in comparison to the many other ways that humans ingest microplastics, Mohanty emphasised.
For example, other researchers estimated last year that a litre (34 fluid ounces) of water in a plastic bottle contained an average of 240,000 microplastics.
'Tyres, plastic bags and bottles'
The most common chewing gum sold in supermarkets is called synthetic gum, which contains petroleum-based polymers to get that chewy effect, the researchers said.
However packaging does not list any plastics in the ingredients, simply using the words "gum-based".
"Nobody will tell you the ingredients," Mohanty said.
The researchers tested five brands of synthetic gum and five of natural gum, which use plant-based polymers such as tree sap.
"It was surprising that we found microplastics were abundant in both," Lowe told AFP.
David Jones, a researcher at the UK's University of Portsmouth not involved in the study, said he was surprised the researchers found certain plastics not known to be in gum, suggesting they could have come from another source in the lab.
But the overall findings were "not at all surprising", he told AFP.
People tend to "freak out a little bit" when told that the building blocks of chewing gum were similar to what is found "in car tyres, plastic bags and bottles", Jones said.
Oliver Jones, a chemistry professor at Australia's RMIT University, said that if the relatively small number of microplastics were swallowed, they "would likely pass straight through you with no impact".
"I don't think you have to stop chewing gum just yet."
Lowe also warned about the plastic pollution from chewing gum - particularly when people "spit it out onto the sidewalk".
The National Confectioners Association, which represents chewing gum manufacturers in the United States, said in a statement that the study's authors had admitted "there is no cause for alarm".
"Gum is safe to enjoy as it has been for more than 100 years," it said, adding that the ingredients were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
The study, which has been submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, was presented at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in San Diego.
A.G. Barr, the company behind popular UK beverage brands like IRN-BRU and Rubicon, has on Tuesday announced its decision to discontinue its Strathmore brand.
This announcement comes as the company reported its results for the year ended 25 January 2025, showcasing strong revenue growth and increased profitability.
The discontinuation of Strathmore could lead to the closure of the manufacturing site in Forfar, Scotland, subject to employee consultation.
Despite this, the company's overall performance has been robust. Revenue increased by 5.1 per cent to £420.4 million, driven largely by a 6.4 per cent growth in soft drinks. Rubicon and IRN-BRU were particular highlights, with distribution gains and successful new product launches contributing significantly to this growth.
Adjusted profit before tax saw a substantial increase of 15.8 per cent, reaching £58.5 million. The company's strategic programme to improve operating margin is reportedly ahead of schedule, with adjusted operating margin up by 130 basis points to 13.6 per cent.
A.G. Barr also reported a strong financial foundation, with net cash at bank of £63.9 million. Shareholders are set to benefit, with adjusted return on capital employed improving to 20.1 per cent and adjusted EPS up by 17.4 per cent. The company has also recommended a final dividend of 13.76p.
A.G. Barr said current trading aligns with expectations, and the outlook for the 2025/26 financial year anticipates continued revenue growth and margin improvement. This positive forecast takes into account the 53-week year, the proposed Strathmore discontinuation, and additional regulatory compliance costs.
“2024/25 was a successful year for the company,” Euan Sutherland, chief executive, said. “Looking forward, we have a refreshed strategy centred on growth and are committed to our long-term financial targets. I am confident that successful execution of our plans will see another year of positive progress towards our long-term goals.”
In February 2025, A.G. Barr announced an organisational simplification, integrating Barr Soft Drinks and FUNKIN into a unified operation.
Keep ReadingShow less
Scottish Anti-Illicit Trade Group relaunches to combat counterfeiting
The Scottish Anti-Illicit Trade Group (SAITG) has relaunched this month, with the aim of combating counterfeiting and intellectual property crime in Scotland.
Supported by the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO), the group brings together law enforcement, government and businesses to strengthen Scotland’s fight against this illicit trade.
According to IPO research, almost one in three of those asked (29%) across the UK have purchased counterfeit goods in the past. Almost one in five (19%) said they purchase them often, sometimes or on an occasional basis.
For 2021, the overall estimated value of imported counterfeit goods into the UK was over £7 billion.
The group will focus on developing best practice and enhancing collective strategies to tackle the supply of counterfeit goods across Scotland. They will form a coordinated response to protect Scottish products, businesses and consumers from the threat of IP crime.
“The Scottish Anti-Illicit Trade Group has an important role to play in disrupting the production and distribution of counterfeit and illicit goods," Scottish justice secretary Angela Constance said.
"As well as harming legitimate businesses, the profits of such activities fund other criminal activity. The Serious Organised Crime Taskforce, which I chair, will continue to work with the SAITG to do everything we can to tackle this illegal activity.”
Panel discussion at the relaunch of the SAITG on 3 March 2025
SAITG brings together members including the Scotch Whisky Association, Police Scotland, Trading Standards, The Wine & Spirit Trade Association and The Anti-Counterfeiting Group. Together, they will create a forum for distinct industry areas to share insight, intelligence and provide training and support for law enforcement agencies.
The group’s work will also help build a greater understanding among the wider public of the harms this trade causes, emphasising that counterfeiting is anything but a victimless crime.
“We are pleased to support the re-launch of the Scottish Anti-Illicit Trade Group, which marks an important moment in tackling this significant threat to businesses and consumers in Scotland,” Miles Rees, the IPO’s deputy director of enforcement, said.
“Counterfeit goods not only harm those using them, but also cause wider harms to society, our economy and communities. Government, industry and law enforcement all have a crucial role to play in working together to combat counterfeiting and piracy, and the group represents a vital forum, helping drive action together.”
Rachel Jones, newly appointed chair of the Scottish Anti-Illicit Trade Group and founder of Snapdragon, said: “Counterfeiting is not a victimless crime. It is the second largest source of criminal income in the world, after drugs. I’m very honoured to chair this group as we bring together key partners to protect Scotland’s heritage brands and consumers.”
Alan Park, director of legal affairs at the Scotch Whisky Association, highlighted the importance of protecting Scotland’s premium products.
“Food and drink products strongly associated with their origin, like Scotch Whisky, carry a significant reputation based on their quality, authenticity and generations of investment,” Park said.
“Those who attempt to take fraudulent advantage of that reputation will always face strong action, and the formation of this group is a significant step to help serve a strong message that this illegal activity won’t be tolerated.”
Members of the public can report suspected counterfeit goods to Police Scotland by calling 101 or anonymously through Crimestoppers.
Keep ReadingShow less
UK Easter spending shifts amid cost concerns - Vypr research
Chocolate purchasing intent for Easter is expected to slide due to factors like the ongoing cost of living crisis and growing concerns over sustainability while Easter-themed wrapping paper is expected to be in demand this year, states a recent report.
According to a UK consumer survey by product intelligence platform Vypr, 39 per cent of people are cutting back on chocolate eggs this year, while 24 per cent plan to spend less than £5 on Easter gifts.
While health concerns have led 29 per cent of consumers to scale back their Easter egg purchases, sustainability is a factor for many shoppers.
The desire for more eco-friendly options is evident for some, as 17 per cent of people are looking to choose gifts with less packaging, and another 17 per cent are prioritising items wrapped in less plastic.
Additionally, 15 per cent are opting to skip Easter altogether this year to avoid contributing to waste.
Despite these preferences, many shoppers are still planning to spend this Easter, although most say it’s going to be very low-key, with the majority (53 per cent) expecting to spend less than £10 in total, covering gifts, decorations, and entertaining.
Encouragingly for retailers, over a third (35 per cent) of consumers plan to spend between £10 and £50.
Chocolate eggs will still play a key part in these purchases, but for some, alternatives are gaining popularity. Cash gifts (10 per cent) and toys (9 per cent) are among the most popular choices.
Additionally, 10 per cent are looking for chocolate that isn’t egg-shaped, while 8 per cent will be buying Easter decorations.
Vypr noted that many supermarkets, convenience stores and wider retailers have expanded their range of Easter decorations this year, with 21 per cent of shoppers saying they have noticed the increased variety.
However, only 8 per cent report that this is likely to persuade them to purchase. Overall, 54 per cent of people do not decorate for Easter, and of those who do, 14 per cent plan to reuse last year’s decorations, while only 10 per cent will buy new ones.
Ben Davies, founder of Vypr, commented, “Retailers have plenty to consider when planning their 2025 Easter ranges.
"A quarter of shoppers are looking to gift-wrap Easter presents this year, making Easter-themed wrapping paper a clear opportunity to drive sales.
"Meanwhile, one in ten plan to buy Easter-themed clothing for children – which is something supermarkets could tap into to boost seasonal sales.
“Sustainability is also becoming a bigger priority for consumers, and demand for eco-friendly alternatives will only grow. This is a key area for NPD teams to explore, ensuring their ranges appeal to increasingly eco-conscious shoppers.”
Keep ReadingShow less
UK consumers cut spending as economic worries grow - KPMG
Majority of Brits feel that the economy is heading in the wrong direction, and this feeling is leading many to cut everyday spend, defer big ticket buying, and save more, a recent report has stated.
According to the latest quarterly Consumer Pulse survey from KPMG in the UK, three in five people say that the UK economy is worsening, leading even consumers feeling financially secure to cut back on spending.
The number of people feeling that the UK economy is worsening grew by fifteen percentage points in the last three months to 58 per cent.
But despite the perception of a downbeat economic picture, the majority (55 per cent) of people currently feel financially secure (which is just 2 percentage points lower than the previous quarter).
The research gauged the confidence of 3000 UK consumers and assessed their buying behaviour over the last quarter.
Those feeling insecure about their finances grew from 21 per cent to 24 per cent over the last three months, but within that only 15 per cent of people reported that their finances are such that they are having to actively cut discretionary spend to pay for essentials – with a further 2 per cent saying they are incurring debt to pay bills.
The growing negative economic perception is leading more consumers to take spending action than those who say their financial situation means they need to, with:
43 per cent saying they are reducing spend on everyday items.
36 per cent saying they are saving more as a contingency.
29 per cent saying they are deferring big ticket purchases.
19 per cent feeling less inclined to leave their current employment.
Reflecting upon the findings, Linda Ellett, head of consumer, retail and leisure for KPMG UK, said, “Our research continues to show that while only a minority of consumers feel financially insecure, the majority feel that the economy is heading in the wrong direction.
"And this nervousness about the economy is leading many, including some of those who are secure in their current personal financial circumstances, to cut everyday spend, defer big ticket buying, and save more.
“Some may be taking this action as they prepare for higher costs, such as a new mortgage deal or the higher cost of travel.
"But other cautious consumers are certainly preparing for the potential impact on them from what they believe to be a worsening economy. This week’s Spring Statement needs to give people the confidence in the longer-term UK economic outlook.”
Comparing consumer spending in the first quarter of 2025 to the results from the final quarter of 2024:
Eating out remains the most common target (38 per cent) for those cutting spend. Takeaway was second, with 34 per cent of consumers reporting less spend over the last three months. The number of people saying they are cutting back was 2 percentage points higher than the last survey.
The number of consumers reporting they cut clothing and footwear spend in the last three months rose 3 percentage points from the last survey to 32 per cent.
Cost cutting behaviour when shopping was once again evident, with:
Nearly a quarter of consumers (23 per cent) saying they shopped for promotional or discount goods more in the last three months.
Just over a fifth (22 per cent) of consumers saying they bought more own brand or value goods in the last three months.
A fifth (21 per cent) of consumers saying they used loyalty schemes more this quarter.
70 per cent of consumers said that price was a top purchasing driver for everyday items – rising 3 percentage points from the last survey.
Holiday spend was again the most common ‘big ticket’ quarterly spend, with 21 per cent of consumers reporting related spend in the last three months. 30 per cent of consumers say they will spend on a holiday in next three months.
45 per cent of consumers said they bought no ‘big ticket’ items in December, January and February. And 38 per cent said they won’t make any larger purchases in the coming three months.