“Accountability” and “truth” are what victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal are pinning for, as the Sir Wyn Williams inquiry heard some key hearings from the Post Office top brasses in the past weeks to establish how the Horizon system led to such disastrous consequences and who is to blame.
The Horizon IT scandal involved Post Office Limited pursuing thousands of innocent sub postmasters for shortfalls in their accounts, which had in fact been caused by faults in Horizon, the accounting software developed and maintained by Fujitsu. More than 900 sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted for stealing because of incorrect information from Horizon, and the notorious affair has become the UK's most widespread miscarriage of justice.
The Post Office itself took many cases to court, prosecuting 700 people between 1999 and 2015 while another 283 cases were brought by other bodies, including the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Most of those affected went bankrupt in the process, many were jailed, marriages broke down, many were ostracised by their local communities, at least four committed suicides while many passed away before being able to clear their names.
555 such convictions were quashed in 2021 while a bill quashing the convictions of hundreds of sub-postmasters has now become the law after being brought forward due to the general election. However, many questions still remain unanswered, and all eyes are now on the ongoing public statutory inquiry.
The latest phase of hearing saw the first-time public hearing of former Post Office boss Paula Vennells, who joined the system in 2007 and served as its chief executive from 2012 to 2019. The three-day hearing during which Vennells gave evidence saw a packed room filled with people, including many former sub-postmasters. The mood in the room became more defiant as the days progressed.
Former Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells arrives on her third day of testifying at the Post Office inquiry on May 24, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)
According to Vennells’ 775-page witness statement, she was not being given the information and documents she needed to find out the truth about the Horizon IT system. Although there was a lot she could not remember, she had a slew of tearful apologies to offer.
One of such apologies was also extended to former sub postmaster Lee Castleton, saying the business’ treatment of Castleton was “unforgivable”.
In 2003, Castleton was the Sub postmaster at East Bridlington Post Office in Yorkshire. In January 2004, the Horizon system at East Bridlington went haywire. By March 2004 the unexplained losses had hit £25,000. He was suspended after an audit that same month and ordered to repay the money. He refused.
He was eventually taken to the High Court by the Post Office where he had to represent himself. When he lost his case, the Post Office pursued him for legal costs of £321,000 which bankrupted him. After the legal action, Castleton was forced to close his shop, sell his house and move into rented accommodation, while his wife suffered stress-induced seizures and his children had to move schools because of bullying.
During the earlier hearings, Stephen Dilley, who represented the Post Office in the civil claim against Castleton, told the inquiry that Post Office knew wanted to “show the world” how it would defend the Horizon system.
Castleton however remains unimpressed and unaffected by Vennell’s apology. All he seeks now is truth and transparency as he now wants to move on in his life.
“Do I believe that Paula Vennells really feels now that what happened to me was ‘unforgivable’? I don't know. That’s her own personal opinion on what she feels is the right or wrong thing to do.
“Paula Vennells has lived her life and did whatever she had to do. I just want to get on with my life and move on forward. The lack of truth, the lack of openness and the lack of candidness is slowing everything down”, he told Asian Trader.
The former sub postmaster also pointed out that the there is a “stark difference between what they remember and what is actually written”.
"I think the judiciary needs to make up their minds and decide whether there's anything that they need to take further. Accountability is something that we all are hoping for,” Castleton said.
Institutional defensiveness
It also emerged during the recent hearings that the Post Office was showing signs of culture of institutional defensiveness as the top bosses were more concerned about the press rather than the truth behind the Horizon’s anomalies and its impact on those wrongly affected.
The inquiry heard that in 2013, when issues with bugs were discovered, Vennells was internally questioning if there should be a review of past prosecutions going back many years. The PR boss advised against this, saying “we don't want to be front page news" to which Vennells agreed.
However, on the ground, lives were being ripped apart.
Retailer Vipin Patel had been running the Horspath Post Office since 2002. The shortfalls due to issues with the Horizon system started almost immediately. By 2010, Vipin had paid around £45,000 from his own pocket to cover the shortfall. However, in December that year, auditors found a further shortfall of £34,000.
With no money left to cover this amount, Vipin was interrogated by Post Office investigators and suspended. He was given an 18-week suspended prison sentence in 2011 with an electronic tag for two months.
His total Horizon generated losses amounting to £77,000. He had to cash in his Royal Mail pension, sell his wife’s family heirlooms passed down over three generations and had to borrow money from his sister to cover profound discrepancies.
Apart from huge financial losses, it was the humiliation, racial abuse and being branded as thieves that further broke the back of the family. Poster of “Wanted Dead or Alive” was stuck on the family’s store, while the family was targeted multiple times by the residents of the area.
Vipin’s conviction was eventually quashed by Southwark Crown Court in 2020, but the damage that was done still continues to haunt the family.
Vipin Patel, along with wife and son Varchasanraj Patel, on the day his conviction was quashed
Since the family’s finances took a hit, Vipin’s son, Varchasanraj V Patel, also known as Varchas, could not keep up with his higher education.
The family is not satisfied with Vennell’s statements.
Varchas told Asian Trader, “The new details emerging from Post Office Inquiry goes to prove how much the High Court in the Bates -v- Post Office was left in the dark.
“We were hopeful Paula Vennells would be more forthcoming compared to many witnesses prior to her giving evidence whose memories weren’t very good, but during Paula Vennells evidence sessions over three days, especially in the morning of the first day, it became clear to me she was not going to play ball and her recollection of events seems to be as bad as her colleagues.
“She was not being honest; her tears were just for show and the apologies were feeble and hollow,” Varchas told Asian Trader.
What’s next?
Phase 5 and 6 of the inquiry (expected to last until end of July) is still on. Some of the key names yet to be heard in this phase are Alice Perkins (former Chair of Post Office Ltd), Richard Christou (former Chief Executive and Executive Chairman of Fujitsu Services Holdings plc) and Gareth Jenkins (former Distinguished Engineer at Fujitsu Services Ltd).
Both Castleton and Varchas believe that Horizon was not the problem, but it was people behind it.
Castleton told Asian Trader, “This is not about some broken computer system. The software didn’t hurt people. We were made victims by another set of people who blindly believed in the system. It was those people who convicted us and made us broke.”
Varchas said, “It is more than evident that the Horizon system alone was not the problem, it was a human effort to pervert the course of justice and destroy so many sub postmaster lives. For example, one of my father’s investigators knew of a very damaging bug yet failed to investigate my father’s branch and hid the information.”
Varchas also believes that the ongoing inquiry must also concentrate on whether race played any part in the Post Office’s decision to prosecute their employees or anywhere in the criminal justice process.
He said, “A Fujitsu engineer who worked on the Horizon helpdesk told the inquiry in oral evidence that every time a south Asian sub-postmaster called the helpdesk, the helpdesk staff would shout across an open planned office and say, ‘we have another scamming Patel’.
“It was not only the mindset of NBSC and Horizon helpdesk, but the Post Office board and management equally thought the sub-postmasters had their hands in the till and tempted to steal –basically they had all stereotyped us.”
Varchas and his family want the complete truth to come out at the earliest.
“I really want the inquiry to drill down to every part of Post Office failures, but the Post Office is still fighting in the sense of its continued disclosure failures with the inquiry.”
Castleton too wants the truth to emerge and the real offenders to be held accountable for.
He said, "I want more truth. I've never seen as much paperwork as the inquiry now has. There are millions and millions of documents. We never had that amount of information before, and it just shows what was going on behind the scenes.
"The next stage to that will be quite interesting. I think Paula Vennells pointed the fingers at certain people, including the government. It'd be interesting to hear what they say about that, because somebody somewhere thought it was okay to spend hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayer's money trying to defend the indefensible. I'd like to see who did that.”
Former sub post master Vipin Patel
“I hope that going forward, people can find it in their hearts to give us justice, to give us openness and show some kindness. That's what I would like.”
There are different compensation schemes in place to pay wronged sub-postmasters, including the Group Litigation Order relating to the 555 sub-postmasters in the group brought together by Sir Alan Bates. Calls are now being raised to pay the claimants quickly and give uplift to the interim payment.
Despite the decades being passed and years since Vipin’s conviction was quashed, he has not been offered any compensation. The old couple still runs a convenience store in Oxfordshire at the same site while Varchas helps after work and on weekends. The Post Office branch is now closed. Varchas said the abuse his father endured from the community during those years led to the rapid deterioration of his health.
Varchas told Asian Trader, “My father has not been offered a settlement by the Post Office because his claim has yet to be calculated which could take another couple of years (give or take).
“What is needed for my father and many sub-postmasters is a substantive uplift in interim payments that could potentially see my father retire. Currently he still helps my mother run our shop in Oxfordshire where the harm was inflicted by Post Office and some very horrible locals.”
However, with the elections in July and a new government in the making, the compensation process is expected to be slowed down further, leaving hundreds of victims, including people like Vipin and 91-year-old Betty Brown, clueless and waiting.
A leading retailers' body has raised concern that Employment Rights Bill risks punishing responsible businesses rather than focusing on unscrupulous employers.
According to amendments tabled by the government to its flagship employment legislation, all British workers, including nearly a million agency workers, will be entitled to a contract which reflects the hours they regularly work.
Government said the amendments will offer increased security for working people to receive reasonable notice of shifts and proportionate pay when shifts are cancelled, curtailed or moved at short notice – whilst retaining the necessary flexibility for employers in how they manage their workforces.
Responding to the tabled amendments on the Employment Rights Bill, Helen Dickinson, Chief Executive at the British Retail Consortium, said, “The BRC supports the Government’s goal to ensure improved employment practices.
"We want a level playing field for responsible businesses, which means tackling unscrupulous employers and we support measures to crack down on those who exploit their workforce.
“While Government has been listening to the concerns of businesses, the latest amendments show that they have much further to go if they wish to reach a place which protects employees while supporting investment in jobs.
"We welcome the changes made around collective consultation, but further amendments are urgently needed, particularly in relation to guaranteed hours and trade unions.
“The focus of the Employment Rights Bill should be on unscrupulous employers who undermine confidence in the labour market, instead the current regulations risk punishing responsible businesses who provide employment.
"We will continue to work closely with Government on the future of the Bill to ensure a progressive approach that avoids raising the costs of employment for those already doing things well and limiting the flexibility for staff, which is so important in retail.
"This pragmatism and collaboration also needs to continue beyond the passage of the Bill, as the implementation detail of various areas is still to be worked through.”
Calling the bill "biggest upgrade to workers’ rights in a generation", Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said that for too long millions of workers have been forced to face insecure, low paid and irregular work, while the economy is blighted by low growth and low productivity.
"We have been working closely with businesses and workers to progress this landmark bill and deliver our Plan for Change - unleashing growth and making work pay for everyone."
Leading confectionery manufacturer Perfetti Van Melle has appointed Rob Lockley as its new commercial managing director in the UK.
Lockley joined the team as sales director 18 months ago, where he has played a leading role in boosting performance across the four major brands: Mentos, Chupa Chups, Fruit-tella and Smint.
His leadership comes at an exciting time for the business, which is now valued at £131.6 million, growing at 3.6 per cent YOY, and well ahead of the market which has seen a 0.9 per cent value decline since last year.
In 2024, Perfetti Van Melle saw incredible performance growth including innovative new launches such as Mentos Discovery, which delivered a staggering £1.3m in value sales alone. Perfetti Van Melle brand’s value growth of 9.1 per cent in the final month of 2024, driven by Mints and Sweets, contributed to a market value share of 4.85 per cent.
With Lockley at the helm, 2025 is set to be another big year for the business, capitalising on innovation and growing distribution across all channels.
Over the past 30 years, he has worked with some of the UK’s largest grocery brands including Kelloggs, CCEP, Mars Wrigley and Muller. His experience in blue chip companies paired with his work at start-up Fulfil nutrition, where he helped prepare the brand for acquisition by Ferrero has fuelled him with a passion to help challengers come out on top.
“I am thrilled to be taking this next step in my career with Perfetti Van Melle. I’ve spent the last 18 months immersing myself back into the world of confectionery, which in the UK is now worth £1.6 billion, the opportunities are endless,” Lockley said.
“The retail environment is moving at a rapid pace and we need to ensure we’re evolving alongside it, bringing fresh thinking and new shopper missions to the forefront. Our brands exude quality, which is half the battle given taste is the number one purchase driver. As challengers we have a mischievous role to play; we can be fun, bold and disruptive to achieve our goals. In 2025 we will be agile, leveraging the skills and capabilities of our wonderful team in a market that is ripe for change.”
Keep ReadingShow less
UK supermarket anti-competitive practices under scrutiny
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has identified 107 breaches of the Groceries Market Investigation (Controlled Land) Order 2010 by Co-op, raising serious concerns about the retailer’s compliance with competition regulations.
The breaches, detailed in an open letter published on Wednesday by the CMA, relate to land agreements that restricted competition by preventing rival supermarkets from opening nearby. The Order was introduced to prevent large grocery retailers from using such agreements to limit consumer choice and stifle market competition.
Following a previous case involving Tesco in 2020, the CMA had instructed all large grocery retailers, including Co-op, to review their compliance with the Order.
The CMA’s investigation into Co-op confirmed that 107 breaches had occurred since the Order came into force, with three still remaining unresolved at the time of the letter’s publication.
Despite the significant number of breaches, the CMA acknowledged that “Co-op has proactively taken steps to address the root causes of these breaches, has cooperated with the CMA to date and is now working with the CMA to take further remedial action to address the breaches identified.”
Additionally, the retailer will now provide annual compliance reports to the CMA to ensure future adherence to the regulations.
However, the CMA expressed strong concerns over the scale of the breaches, stating that they demonstrate “significant failures in compliance for a business of Co-op’s size, resources and standing,” particularly given that the Order has been in force since 2010.
The CMA now expects Co-op to promptly rectify the remaining breaches.
Since it launched its probe in 2020, the regulator has forced Waitrose to re-write anti-competitive land deals, secured agreements from Morrisons and Marks and Spencer to stop using such land agreements, and warned Sainsbury's and Asda over the use of these agreements.
Keep ReadingShow less
Usdaw report highlights rising retail crime and violence
Shocking details of racial and sexual abuse have emerged in retail trade union Usdaw's annual crime survey, which also reports increasing number of shop thefts. The report also shows that violence continues to remain at "double the pre-pandemic levels".
Based on the survey of nearly 10,000 retail staff, Usdaw's report released today (5) shows that shoplifting has nearly doubled since the pandemic and rose by 23 per cent last year.
The survey also found that while the situation has improved since the exceptionally high levels during the pandemic, abuse, threats and assaults remain higher than pre-Covid levels in 2019.
Usdaw’s survey of 9,481 retail staff found that in the last twelve months, most retail workers (77 per cent) experienced verbal abuse, while half (53 per cent) reported to have been threatened by a customer. About one in ten were assaulted.
Some of the incident mentioned in the report highlights the kind of abuse that retail workers have to face at their work place.
The report notes that the leading cause of customer frustration is short-staffing.
Shoplifting increased significantly during 2024, with the police and employers both recording higher levels of incidents, and this is reflected in it being a major flashpoint for abuse of retail staff.
Enforcement of the law remains a considerable issue for retail staff, particularly alcohol sales and other age-restricted products. A key argument for a protection of retail workers law is that legislators passing laws should offer suitable protection for those who are enforcing them, states the report.
Harassment is relatively low among the whole sample, but the survey found that racial harassment among all non-white workers is 48 per cent and is slightly higher at 52 per cent for non-white women. One-third of women under 27 suffered sexism.
The report mentions some of the comments shop workers shared when responding to Usdaw’s survey.
"Homophobic comments, threats to hurt me because I refused a sale, mocking me when asked for ID. I was once held up at knifepoint. Often told to f**k off," stated one worker.
“Sworn at regularly, particularly by young customers when asked for ID for cigarettes and energy drinks. Had bottles of medicine thrown at me.”
"Daily personal insults. Swearing because I can’t sell them alcohol because they’re drunk. One squared up to me and threatened me with physical violence," states the report citing a statement from a retail staff.
Commenting on the survey's findings, Paddy Lillis – Usdaw General Secretary, says that no-one should feel afraid to go to work, but our evidence shows that too many retail workers are.
"It is shocking that over three-quarters of our members working in retail are being abused, threatened and assaulted for simply doing their job and serving the community. They provide an essential service and deserve our respect and the protection of the law.
"Our members have reported that they are often faced with hardened career criminals and we know that retail workers are much more likely to be abused by those who are stealing to sell goods on.
"Theft from shops and armed robbery were triggers for 66 per cent of these incidents. Violence and abuse are not an acceptable part of the job and much more needs to be done to protect shop workers. So, we are delighted that the Government has listened and last week introduced the Crime and Policing Bill in to the House of Commons, with measures to address these significant issues.
“We now look forward to a much-needed protection of retail workers’ law; ending the indefensible £200 threshold for prosecuting shoplifters, which has effectively become an open invitation to retail criminals; and funding for more uniformed officer patrols in shopping areas, along with Respect Orders for offenders.
"We will review the details for the provisions and look forward to engaging with the Government as the Bill goes through Parliament, with the first debate and vote due to take place on Monday.
“Scotland has had a protection of shop workers law in place since 2021, after Labour’s Daniel Johnson MSP promoted the legislation, and it has already been used in around 10,000 incidents. The Northern Ireland Executive has agreed to introduce similar measures in due course.
"After many years of campaigning alongside retail employers, it really now feels like governments are listening and taking action to give all retail workers across the UK the protections and respect they deserve.”
These findings follow similar trends to recent reports from British Retail Consortium, which found significant increases in violence and abuse against shop workers alongside much higher levels of shoplifting, which are costing the industry £4 billion in lost stock and security measures.
Helen Dickinson, Chief Executive of the British Retail Consortium, stated that Usdaw’s findings are another appalling reminder of what so many people working in our industry can face.
"No one should go to work fearing for their safety, and yet our most recent crime survey showed incidents of violence and abuse soaring to record levels. A confrontation may be over in minutes, but for many victims, their families and colleagues, the physical and emotional impact can last a lifetime.
"We owe it to the three million hardworking people working in retail to bring the epidemic of crime to heel, and we look forward to seeing the crucial legislation to protect retail workers enacted as soon as possible.”
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has on Wednesday issued best practice industry guidance on providing allergen information to consumers with food hypersensitivities, encouraging information on food allergens to be available in writing in the out of home sector.
The guidance applies to food businesses providing non-prepacked or ‘loose’ food in person or via online sales. It aims to support food businesses when providing information on the 14 food allergens to their customers, whilst helping to keep consumers safe.
The update follows a consultation on the guidance, as well as FSA research and engagement with consumers and food businesses to better understand how food businesses could improve written information for consumers with food hypersensitivities.
“We are still encouraging consumers to tell food business staff about any food allergies or intolerances, but we are now setting an expectation that businesses should provide written allergen information and encourage a conversation with their customers,” Katie Pettifer, FSA chief executive, said.
“By following the guidance, businesses can promote consumer confidence in their food businesses by ensuring consumers can understand the allergen information and ensure they don’t feel excluded from experiencing our vibrant food culture.”
The updated guidance includes:
Written allergen information should always be available for non-prepacked food alongside a conversation between servers and customers about their allergen requirements
examples of how to provide written allergen information
free tools to support businesses with implementation, such as allergy icons, an allergen matrix and a new allergy poster which food businesses can download and use on their own assets (e.g. menus and websites)
This updated guidance applies to businesses operating in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.