The Gambling Commission today said it has won a favourable ruling from the High Court to lift the suspension on its decision to select Allwyn Entertainment as its preferred applicant to run the National Lottery for the Fourth Licence.
Current licence holder Camelot, which has held the lottery licence since its inception in 1994, has initiated legal proceedings in April in relation to the competition process, placing an automatic suspension on the commission’s ability to formally award the licence to Allwyn.
In May, the commission approached the court asking to lift the suspension, saying that the disrupting the implementation of Allwyn’s plans would present potentially severe consequences for the National Lottery and good causes.
“Today – 29 June – the court agreed to lift the suspension. We will, therefore, begin the important work of formally awarding the licence to Allwyn. Our priority is to continue to work to implement our decision and ensure a seamless and timely transition to the next licence, for the benefit of participants and good causes,” the commission said in a statement.
The commission added that they will now be preparing for trial of the various claims.
“We remain resolute that we have run a fair and robust competition, and that our evaluation has been carried out fairly and lawfully in accordance with our statutory duties. We have taken every step possible to ensure a level playing field for all interested parties, to enable us to appoint a licensee who will engage and protect players, run the National Lottery with integrity and ensure the National Lottery maximises support for good causes and its contribution to society through further innovation and investment,” the commission said.
Launching the legal challenge in its capacity as an applicant for the Fourth Licence, Camelot has held that the Gambling Commission has got the decision “badly wrong”, adding that the commission failed to provide a satisfactory response on the decision despite a lengthy correspondence.
The current licence of the National Lottery is set to expire in 2024.
Almost a third of online deliveries from big supermarkets such as Tesco and Aldi included a swapped item, many of which were deemed as "completely inappropriate” by the shoppers, shows a recent poll.
According to a survey by Which? 29 per cent of online grocery shoppers said they received a substitution in their most recent order, with some stating that they had received some unexpected replacements like receiving fish steaks instead of cupcakes, and sanitary towels in place of sandwich wraps.
Among the supermarkets goofing up, Asda ranks the highest with almost half of Asda shoppers receiving a replacement product in their last order, the survey suggests, and they gave the supermarket just two stars out of five for its choice of substitute items.
One customer reported receiving bananas instead of pizza, another found a roasting tin in place of roast potatoes and a third said they had been given micellar water facial cleanser instead of drinking water.
The poll found a third of Sainsbury’s customers (32 per cent) found a substitution in their latest shop, although the grocer received three stars for its selections, suggesting they were generally well-received.
Among the more bizarre examples reported to Which? were beef dog treats instead of beef steaks and leeks instead of flowers.
Among the 31 per cent of Morrisons customers sent replacement items was one who said they found sanitary towels instead of sandwich wraps and another who received fish steaks in place of lemon cupcakes.
Unlike most independent convenience stores who try to reach out to the shopper before making a swap, supermarkets tend to consider computer-generated options based on factors such as brand similarity, the price and availability.
Retailer Biren Patel, owner of Budgens Berrymoor, and Natalie Lightfoot, owner of Lodis Solo Convenience store in Scotland, are among the retailers who make sure to call the customer if he finds an item from online order out of stock.
In a recent conversation with Asian Trader, Patel explained, “We take extra care with delivery customers, like if we get an order and we don’t have one thing, we call and ask for replacements rather than removing it from list or adding something from our side.
He also added that since most of the time, such online orders are immediate need-based, he makes sure not to miss any item as it might be "a necessary ingredient of a family meal preparation".
Such personalised service is often not present at the bigger chains.
While many saw the funny side of substitutions, Which? heard from several customers who complained about receiving meat or dairy instead of vegetarian or vegan alternatives.
Some supermarkets allow customers to opt out of receiving replacement items altogether, but most will notify customers about substitutions beforehand via email or text and allow them to refuse the new item if they do not want it.
All the supermarkets in Which?’s survey allow customers to hand back unwanted substitutions to the delivery driver, or when they pick up a click and collect, and receive a refund.
The license of a convenience store in Birmingham got revoked after it a knife was sold to a teenager and a hoard of fake and illegal goods were found at the premises.
According to local reports, Sandwell Council revoked the license granted to retailer Mandeep Sharma, owner of Hill Top Supermarket in West Bromwich, after a catalogue of illegal tobacco products, alcohol, prescription-only drugs, and fake mobile phones found at his store last year.
In another incident, a 15-year-old was also sold a pack of knives unchallenged at the store as part of an undercover sting by Sandwell’s trading standards.
A search of the shop in Hill Top in October last year found illegal cigarettes, banned snus and high-strength vapes, as well as illicit alcohol.
Hundreds of packets of Sildenafil, a prescription-only erectile dysfunction medicine commonly referred to as Viagra, were also found last year alongside bottles of Spumante labelled as genuine prosecco.
Sandwell’s trading standards returned later that week as part of an undercover sting which saw the shop sell a knife to a 15-year-old during a test purchase without asking for ID.
In another incident, a shop in Coventry which was selling items illegally has had its closure extended by another three months.
As informed by West Midlands Police, Sol's newsagents in Longford, which was closed for three months in December last year, will remain close for next three months as well.
The police states, "Until 24 May, it remains an offence for anyone not specifically named by the order to set foot in the premises."
The closure order was secured against Sol's following concerns around alcohol, tobacco and other items being sold to children.
As a result, Coventry Police worked with Coventry City Council to take enforcement action.
Coventry North East Inspector Gemma Marston said, "This premises has been a repeated cause for concern from people in the area and we are pleased to have extended the closure.
"All business owners and managers should take steps to ensure they abide by the laws and licensing regulations.
"Selling vapes and alcohol to children is unacceptable and we will continue to take action against premises where this is known to take place.
"If you have concerns about this kind of activity where you live, let us know and we will work with partners to ensure action is taken."
A leading independent retailers association has applauded Barnsley Council's support package for local businesses, calling on other councils across the UK to follow suit with similar measures.
Bira, the British Independent Retailers Association, praised the council's £5 million initiative offering 100 per cent business rate relief for qualifying retail, leisure and hospitality businesses from April 2025 to March 2026.
Andrew Goodacre, CEO of Bira, said, "We strongly applaud Barnsley Council for this exemplary initiative that directly addresses the mounting challenges facing our high streets. This is exactly the type of support that independent retailers desperately need in the current economic climate.
"We are now calling on councils across the UK to follow Barnsley's lead and implement similar support packages. If there is a surplus of business rates income, that surplus should be returned to businesses in this way.
"It's not only fair but makes economic sense for local communities.
"The triple impact of rising costs, cuts to business rate relief, and increased employer National Insurance contributions has created a perfect storm for retailers.
"Barnsley has shown leadership by listening to its business community and taking decisive action. Every council in Britain should be examining how they can replicate this model," he added.
Bira, which works with over 6000 independent businesses nationwide has consistently campaigned on business rates reform as part of its commitment to revitalising and preserving high streets.
Earlier this month, Bira pointed to BRC Consumer Sentiment Monitor's "worrying picture" saying that these figures represent a concerning trend for high street retailers.
Jeff Moody, Commercial Director for Bira, said, "These figures align with what our members are telling us - over 57 per cent of independent retailers surveyed by Bira reported feeling somewhat or highly unconfident about business prospects for the remainder of Q1 2025, with 56 per cent expressing the same lack of confidence for the rest of the year.
"With consumers actively looking to reduce spending and seeking out cheaper alternatives, independent retailers face significant headwinds.
"This situation is exacerbated by the upcoming cost increases set to take effect from April, including higher National Insurance contributions, National Minimum Wage rises, and Business Rates increases," Moddy said.
Bira has been at the forefront of championing the cause of independent traders and shopkeepers across Britain. Its campaigns cover a wide spectrum of issues such as retail crime, business rates, fair legislation and overall reduction in the regulatory burden.
Keep ReadingShow less
Fujitsu, the tech company at the heart of the UK's Post Office scandal
Fujitsu, the maker of the software behind the wrong conviction of hundreds of sub post masters in Britain's biggest miscarriage of justice, has been asked to make an "interim payment of at least £300 million" to cover the compensation paid to Post Office Horizon scandal.
Labour peer Lord Beamish called on a debate in House of Lords on Thursday (27) on the progress of the Post Office Horizon compensation scheme and of the contribution of Fujitsu to the compensation of victims.
Stating that Fujitsu not only covered up the fact that Horizon system was full of bugs and could be remotely accessed but also took an active part in the prosecution of sub-postmasters, Lord Beamish slammed the Japanese firm for "hiding behind the public inquiry".
"At the public inquiry and the Commons Select Committee, Mr Patterson (Paul Patterson, the director of Fujitsu in the UK) said that he apologised to the sub-postmasters and that Fujitsu would make a contribution to compensate victims.
"As of today, no money has been paid by Fujitsu to victims and this is a company that is still making multimillion-pound profits from government contracts.
"It said that it was not going to bid for new contracts, but what it is doing is extending existing contracts. That is happening at the same time as the taxpayer is paying out nearly £600 million in compensation to victims, and many victims are still waiting for compensation."
Apart from calling on Fujitsu to cough out £300 million as interim payment, Lord Beamish also demanded that the Government should bar Fujitsu from taking part in any future contracts if major change has not taken place.
Conservative peer Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom supported the proposal, noting that while Fujitsu had acknowledged its "moral obligation," it was ultimately the taxpayer who was bearing the financial burden, amounting to hundreds of millions.
He said, "The noble Lord, Lord Beamish, suggested £300 million; £700 million would be less than half the cost that the taxpayer is currently estimated to bear.
"If it does not do that, why should the Government offer it further extensions of its existing contracts, still less grant it new contracts?"
Labour peer Baroness Elliott of Whitburn Bay also expressed her support for the proposal, asserting that it was time for Fujitsu to take responsibility and contribute to the compensation fund.She urged all parties involved to act as swiftly as possible to ensure that all victims of the scandal received the payments they rightfully deserved.Conservative peer Lord Polak emphasized the need for the Government to provide clear and transparent communication to claimants about the claims process, ensuring they understood what to expect and the timeframe involved. He agreed with Lord Beamish’s suggestion of a £300 million contribution from Fujitsu but argued that the company should match the amount already covered by the taxpayer, acknowledging that while it was a significant sum, it was a necessary obligation.
Parliament was told that if the Japanese tech giant was an individual it would be facing years if not decades in jail for its active part in the Horizon IT scandal which saw sub postmasters “maliciously prosecuted”.
The firm continued to enjoy lucrative extensions to government contracts bankrolled by the public while the taxpayer funded payouts to victims of what is believed to be Britain’s biggest miscarriage of justice, Westminster heard.
Hundreds of sub postmasters were wrongly convicted of stealing after Fujitsu’s defective Horizon accounting system made it appear as though money was missing at their branches.
The Post Office also forced at least 4,000 branch managers to pay back cash based on the flawed data. Some victims were sent to prison or financially ruined, others were shunned by their communities, and some took their own lives.
Residents of Ferndown have raised concern as supermarket giant ASDA is planning to open an Express store on Wimborne Road East, next to a family-run convenience store.
According to the local reports, the store owner of SAM Convenience Store in Ferndown has expressed deep concern for the future of her family-run business as supermarket giant ASDA prepares to open an Express store next door.
Ahalya and her husband Lucky, who have operated the store for the past three years, fear the arrival of ASDA could force them out of business.
Apart from the store owner, the community has also rallied in to oppose the upcoming Asda Express store in their neighborhood.
When news broke of ASDA’s plans, more than 400 residents signed a letter to the council opposing the development. The letter, submitted by regular customer Val Wilkinson, highlights the community’s desire to protect independent businesses like SAM Convenience Store.
Wilkinson, who frequently visits the store to buy newspapers, spearheaded the effort to oppose ASDA’s arrival.
“I wrote to the council on [Ahalya’s] behalf and said that I didn’t think it was a good idea having it there,” Val explained. “They provide such good services to us. I’m really upset about it opening next door, to be honest. I just hope they can keep on going.”
Talking to a local publication, Ahalya revealed they are already struggling to stay afloat, and the prospect of competing with a major chain like ASDA has left them feeling “scared” for their livelihood.
“People here are very angry because they don’t want another chain store in the area.
"The town centre already has Tesco, Marks and Spencer, and other big chains,” Ahalya said. “We don’t need one more. Our business is going down, and we don’t want to go. We can’t leave.”
She also expressed her gratitude for the community’s support, noting that customers even brought her a copy of the letter to show their solidarity. “When people found out ASDA was coming, they gave us huge support,” she said.
In March 2024, the shop window was damaged by a suspected BB gun pellet, and last week, roadworks severely impacted trade.
“We lost some of our regular customers during the roadworks,” Ahalya said. “The road in front of our store was closed for a week, and we lost £500 a day. It’s been very difficult.”
As ASDA moves forward with its plans, Ahalya and Lucky remain determined to fight for their business. With the backing of their community, they hope the council will reconsider the development and protect the future of independent stores like theirs.