Post Office has on Wednesday set out an ambitious five-year Transformation Plan to deliver a ‘New Deal for Postmasters’ that significantly increases their total annual income through revenue sharing and strengthens their role in the direction of the organisation.
The ‘New Deal for Postmasters’ follows a strategic review initiated by Nigel Railton, chair of Post Office Ltd, in May. The Transformation Plan sets out an ambition to deliver a quarter of a billion pounds boost to postmasters’ income by 2030.
These improvements to remuneration are subject to funding discussions with government which the company said are “positive and ongoing”.
Alongside this, the Post Office is establishing a new Postmaster Panel where serving postmasters will help the business to improve the support and training it provides to postmasters. A new Consultative Council will also be established to work with the Post Office on the delivery of the Transformation Plan, and to challenge and feedback to ensure postmasters’ interests remain front and centre.
“The value postmasters deliver in their communities must be reflected in their pockets, and this Transformation Plan provides a route to adding more than £250 million annually to total postmaster remuneration by 2030, subject to government funding,” Railton said in a speech delivered to postmasters and Post Office staff.
“It begins a new phase of partnership during which we will strengthen the postmaster voice in the day-to-day running and operations of the business, so they are represented from the frontline to the boardroom.”
In the speech, Railton outlined the commercial, operational, cultural, and reputational challenges that must be addressed to deliver change for postmasters and learn the lessons from the Horizon IT public Inquiry.
“The Post Office has a 360-year history of public service and today we want to secure that service for the future by learning from past mistakes and moving forward for the benefit of all postmasters. We can, and will, restore pride in working for a business with a legacy of service, rather than one of scandal,” he said.
Railton stressed that that the Transformation Plan is a five-year journey encompassing a series of changes. These include:
Strengthening postmasters’ commercial offer to their customers, particularly in banking, and to work with the government, banks, LINK and Cash Access UK to accelerate the roll out of banking hubs.
Delivering a lower-risk, better-value new branch IT system for postmasters gradually.
A major investment in the automation of cash and mails services in-branch to reduce postmasters’ cost-to-serve in their branches and to give customers the experience that they have come to expect from modern retailers.
Creating a new operating model for the business in which a streamlined central organisation acts as a support function for postmasters, offering expert support in marketing, training, and technology to postmasters.
The Post Office added that it will continue to work through the details of the Transformation Plan with colleagues, postmasters, strategic partners and organisations that represent postmasters to refine the plan and implement the changes required to transform the business.
The Post Office’s branch network size consisting of 11,500 branches will not be impacted by the Transformation Plan and the Post Office said it remains committed to strengthening its branch network and making it work better for local communities, independent postmasters and partners who own and operate branches.
“This Transformation Plan is the first step in a five-year journey that will set up the Post Office for years to come,” Neil Brocklehurst, Post Office acting chief executive, said.
“There are many consumers who primarily shop online, but there also many who struggle to use online services or actively choose to shop on their local high street and who want to be served by a human being. Postmasters across the UK serve every generation and this plan not only improves their incomes but also the support that we provide to let them run their businesses and serve their communities.”
Elliot Jacobs, serving postmaster and a non-executive director on the Post Office Board, added: “The last few years have been challenging for many retailers and postmasters are no exception. We have faced cost pressures from rising energy prices, increased national minimum wage and national insurance contributions. It’s vital that the Post Office embarks on this major Transformation Plan so that we have a sustainable financial future, and one that benefits the thousands of postmasters who work tirelessly day-in, day-out to support the local people and businesses who rely on us for essential everyday services.”
Post Office’s new Consultative Council has met for the first time last week on Jan 27 to inform the strategic direction of the organisation. Its remit is to provide a representative postmaster perspective on strategy, culture, funding and governance.
Going forward, the Council agenda could include topics such as banking hubs, the Government’s Green Paper on the future of Post Office, technology strategy or new product development.
The ’New Deal for Postmasters’, announced in November 2024, sets out an ambition to deliver a quarter of a billion pounds boost to postmaster and strategic partner income by 2030.
These improvements to remuneration are subject to funding discussions with government which are positive and ongoing. Postmasters and strategic partners benefited from the first of these increased payments with a £20 million boost to their pay packets in December.
The Council, chaired by Postmaster Non-Executive Director Brian Smith, will meet regularly ahead of Post Office board meetings and a summary of discussions will be published for postmasters to access in a new regular newsletter from the postmaster non-executive directors.
It is comprised of groups representing postmasters, including the National Federation of Sub-Postmasters, Communication Workers Union, Voice of the Postmaster, alongside Post Office's postmaster non-executive directors and Post Office leadership.
Brian Smith is the postmaster for Freefield Post Office on the Shetland Islands and has run the branch for 19 years. Brian was appointed to the Post Office board as a non-executive director in December 2024 and chairs the Consultative Council. Brian Smith said:
“The Consultative Council is an example of the changes which are being implemented at Post Office following evidence heard at the Public Inquiry about the need to embed the postmaster voice throughout the organisation – from the board to the frontline. I am looking forward to bringing almost two decades of experience running a post office to the Council.”
It is one of several changes made or in development at Post Office to ensure the postmaster voice is clearly heard, considered and responded to at every level:
A panel of postmasters will be convened to review operational policies and practice on complex issues and provides feedback and challenge on how they can be improved.
A new wellbeing initiative launched in October 2024 is the result of a collaborative project with the National Federation of Postmasters, Voice of the Postmaster and Post Office colleagues, focused on providing urgent professional care and subject matter expertise on topics ranging from branch security to customer behaviours.
Since August 2024, thirteen regional listening forums have taken place across the UK, with 318 postmasters in attendance, covering a broad range of topics.
The Postmaster Conference, taking place in March, is being co-designed and hosted by postmasters for the first time.
Get the latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Fujitsu created the Horizon IT system that resulted in some 700 local Post Office managers being wrongly convicted for theft and false accounting between 1999 and 2005. (Photo by ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP via Getty Images)
A former sub post master, who was forced to remortgage his house as he lost thousands of pounds in the Post Office Horizon scandal, said more should be done to compensate the families of the sub-postmasters who also suffered.
Alun Lloyd Jones, 78, from Llanfarian, Ceredigion, has reached a settlement with the company.
Jones, who faced an 18 year battle before receiving compensation, said it was important to consider the impact the scandal has had on the families of sub-postmasters.
"Some have died, some have suffered so that their health has broken and some have had divorces because of the hellish pressure," he said.
"You can never get enough money to compensate… some have lost their businesses, their houses and so on and the experience has destroyed families. I feel very strongly that these families should also be considered," he said.
Jones' troubles began in 1998 when he decided to take over his local post office in Llanfarian, near Aberystwyth.
A year later, the Horizon computer system was introduced in all British post offices, to monitor stock and accounts digitally.
Like many other sub-postmasters, Jones started having trouble with the new system in the office in Llanfarian and another he was responsible for in Blaenplwyf.
After the Horizon system showed that nearly £20,000 had disappeared from his accounts, in 2007 he called the police and the Post Office.
Jones told BBC, "I said I need to be audited now. And they were shocked. 'It's not you who calls auditors,' they said to me, 'it's for us to come and audit you'.
"They came down, two bullies - you've never seen people like them. They came in and they immediately made up their minds that I was guilty... the boy immediately said to the woman 'suspend him'."
To avoid being prosecuted, and in accordance with the agreement with the Post Office, he had to pay back the money, borrowing from his father-in-law, remortgaging his house, before later closing the post office and shop.
"I had to use credit cards to go from day-to-day, because we didn't have any money - everything had gone back to the post office," he said, adding that he also faced reputational pressures as a county councillor for 31 years.
Jones said he watched ITV drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office from a hospital bed in Llanelli, having suffered a heart attack while on his way to see his accountant to discuss his compensation claim before the deadline passed.
A year later, in mid-January 2025, Jones reached a settlement with the Post Office under the Horizon Deficit Scheme.
However, two of Jones' children, who saw him struggle with Post Office, passed away not knowing he had received compensation for what they went through.
He said his daughter had witnessed all the anxiety, having lived at home with her parents.
"She was forty years old, and died without knowing that her father had finally received some sort of settlement," he said.
More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted for stealing because of incorrect information from the Horizon computer system, in what has been described as the UK's most widespread miscarriage of justice.
The UK government said they were considering whether action was needed to recognise the suffering of families, while the Post Office said they were "working with the government to pay compensation to victims as soon as possible".
One of the victims of the UK’s infamous Post Office Horizon scandal, Christopher Head OBE, has called on the government to urgently address issues with the redress schemes set up to compensate those affected.
In a letter dated today (7), Head has called on to Minister Gareth Thomas and Secretary of State Jonathan Reynolds to take concrete corrective actions at the earliest, detailing the "unfairness" and inconsistencies plaguing the schemes administered by the Post Office and the Department for Business and Trade (DBT).
This marks a follow-up to a previous letter sent in November 2024, which, according to Head, remains unacknowledged. His latest correspondence highlights delays, adversarial processes, and the mental toll on victims.
In the letter shared on X, Head expressed grave concerns about the "Fixed Sum Awards" system, which offers £75,000 or £600,000 compensation, depending on the scheme. He revealed that some claimants are opting to accept these amounts despite evidence suggesting their claims could be valued much higher.
He writes, "Only yesterday I received yet another email from a claimant I have been assisting for many months in the HSS scheme, who due to anxiety, stress and mental health problems is opting to accept the Fixed Sum Award of £75,000 even though I have advised it is likely from a legal perspective her claim is valued at a much higher level."
Head also warned that the rigid nature of these awards risks undermining the government’s promise of "full and fair redress." Inquiry Chair Sir Wyn Williams had previously raised concerns that fixed awards might be "lost forever" if claimants pursued a full assessment route.
Head criticized the absence of accessible legal support for claimants, many of whom cannot afford the necessary advice. He argued that victims should not bear the financial burden of a scandal caused by institutional failings.
He writes, "Post Office may have caused the original harm, but the harm is being further exasperated by the redress processes. If someone can clearly demonstrate they have a claim that exceeds £75,000, they should be able to receive this amount immediately under the current guidance and then advance a claim for the outstanding balance, which relieves the financial worries they may have and making the remaining process more tolerable."
Head highlighted disparities in how interest calculations on losses are handled across different redress schemes, describing the process as inconsistent and unfair. Using his own case as an example, he noted a significant difference between what he was offered and what he should have received under the methodology applied in other schemes.
“The approach is not consistent, which means we have further unfairness,” he wrote, adding that an independent oversight committee could help ensure fairness and consistency.
Head proposed specific reforms, including removing the “legally binding” stipulation on second-panel assessments in the Group Litigation Order (GLO) scheme. He also urged the government to give final reviewer Sir Ross Cranston a broader remit to resolve disputes earlier in the process.
He concluded by criticizing what he described as a "damage limitation and PR exercise" by Whitehall, rather than a genuine effort to deliver full redress.
Head urged ministers to act swiftly to prevent further harm to victims and ensure the redress process meets its promises.
"The overarching aim of every scheme should be fairness, consistency and benefit of doubt towards the Sub-Postmaster, Postmistress, employees or family members," he states.
Head recently received OBE for services to justice alongside fellow Post Office scandal victims Lee Castleton, Seema Misra and Jo Hamilton. Head stated that despite the OBE being a "huge honour", it was a "double-edged sword" as he, with many others, had not received full redress.
He was falsely accused of stealing more than £80,000 from his branch in West Boldon in 2006 before the criminal case against him was dropped. Head, who became the youngest sub postmaster at the age of 18 when he took over the West Boldon Branch, was then pursued by the Post Office through the civil courts.
The Post Office Horizon scandal saw more than 900 sub postmasters being prosecuted between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon accounting software made it appear that money was missing from their accounts.
Hundreds are still awaiting compensation despite the previous Conservative government announcing that those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000 payouts.
An anonymous group consisting of current and former employees of the Post Office and Royal Mail have called on the Forfeiture Committee to remove of honours awarded to 14 individuals who are connected to the Post Office Horizon scandal.
The 14 names mentioned by the group includes former ministers, civil servants, and Post Office and Royal Mail bosses such as Vince Cable KCB, Ed Davey KCB, Jo Swinson CBE, Donald Brydon CBE, Moya Green DBE, Alan Cook CBE and Alwen Lyons OBE.
The group has written to the committee listing the names of individuals who it said “owned, oversaw, governed and ran the Post Office” during the scandal, Computer Weekly reported.
The letter, as seen by Computer Weekly, stated, “We are deeply concerned by the testimony given under or to the inquiry, particularly during phases five and seven which has revealed beyond any doubt the incompetence, negligence, restlessness, ethical corruption and wilful blindness (‘not me guv’ attitude) of certain individuals at the heart of Whitehall, all of whom have been bestowed with honours.
“There can be no better an example of rewards for failure than those who owned, oversaw, governed and ran the Post Office – a taxpayer-funded organisation – and have received honours for their public or related service.
“The Forfeiture Committee, therefore, does not need to wait to consider stripping honours from those other senior individuals responsible for the scandal who have blatantly contravened a range of governance and conduct codes, legal and fiduciary duties at the Nolan principles.
"Their abject behaviour or failure to act in accordance with these standards has brought the honours systems into disrepute.”
This comes a day after the release of a damning report by Commons MPs on the progress of compensation of Post Office Horizon scandal victims.
In the report by the Business and Trade Committee (BTC), MPs have called for the government to be fined if it fails to provide redress quickly enough to victims of the Horizon software scandal.
MPs have called on to introduce new legally enforceable time limits for each stage of claim processing.
The process of seeking compensation is "akin to a second trial for victims", the committee chair Liam Byrne said.
It is "imperative" applicants receive upfront legal advice paid for by scheme operators rather than applicants, the committee's report said, as evidence given by claimants' solicitors said when they get legal advice, their financial redress offers double.
More than 700 sub-postmasters across the UK were wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office for theft and false accounting using the Horizon software made by Fujitsu which incorrectly generated shortfalls in branches.
Many more incurred large debts, lost homes, experienced relationship breakdown, became unwell in an effort to repay the imagined shortfalls and some took their own lives.
Commons Business and Trade Committee has called for legally binding timeframes on Government at each stage of processing claims under the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme, backed by financial penalties awarded to the claimant if the deadlines are missed.
As mentioned in the report titled "Post Office and Horizon scandal redress: Unfinished business" released by Commons Business and Trade Committee on Wednesday (1), just £499 million of the £1.8 billion set aside for financial redress has been paid out across the four redress schemes, with 72 per cent of the budget for redress still not paid.
In the case of the Horizon Shortfall Scheme, 14 per cent of those who applied before the original 2020 deadline have still not settled their claims.
The Committee found that the “schemes are so poorly designed that the application process is akin to a second trial for victims” with an excessive burden placed on claimants to answer complex requests for information about their losses in the scandal, and delays processing those requests and disclosures back from the Post Office.
On the scheme administrators’ side, legal advice has been extensive and costly. To date, Post Office Ltd has spent £136 million on legal fees relating to the redress schemes, including £82 million to just one firm, Herbert Smith Freehills, for services including their legal advice on the HSS and Overturned Convictions Scheme.
Victims however have been offered no legal advice up-front in submitting their claims, despite being required to grapple complex legal concepts about the amount of redress they were owed.
The committee also mentioned that many years had passed and the victims no longer had access to the financial records of where Horizon’s systemic errors had occurred. The Committee says it is “imperative” now that claimants are offered legal advice up front, at no cost to themselves but paid for by the scheme administrators.
Chair of the BTC Rt Hon Liam Byrne MP said, “Years on from the biggest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, thousands of Post Office Horizon victims still don’t have the redress to which they’re entitled for the shatter and ruin of their lives.
“Ours is a nation that believes in fair play and the rule of law. Yet victims told us that seeking the redress to which they’re entitled is akin to a second trial. Payments are so slow that people are dying before they get justice. But the lawyers are walking away with millions.
“This is quite simply, wrong, wrong, wrong.
"The government has made important steps forward. Almost half a billion pounds of redress payments are now out the door, the budget has gone up to being fully funded and the Post Office was ordered to write to everyone who might be owed something for what happened to them.
“But we can’t go on like this. Justice delayed is justice denied. So today, we’re setting out a practical, common-sense plan to reboot the redress system.
“Victims should have upfront legal advice to help make sure they get what’s fair. We need hard deadlines for government lawyers to approve the claims with financial penalties for taking too long. Crucially, we need the Post Office, which caused this scandal in the first place, taken out of the picture.”
The Committee calls on Government to remove the Post Office from administering any of the redress schemes and to introduce binding timeframes for scheme administrators at each individual stage of each scheme, with financial penalties passed on to the claimant if these deadlines are not met.
The MPs have also asked the Government to appoint an independent adjudicator for each scheme and empower them to provide directions and case management to ensure claimants move through the process swiftly.
The Government is also called on to provide clear, strong instructions to taxpayer-funded lawyers to maximise the speed of redress, eliminate legal delays, enhance the benefit of doubt given to claimants, and publish the costs spent on lawyers for the public and Parliament to see.