Change is the only constant. While the food and drink sector may appear a slow-moving segment, it is in fact an ever-evolving one. The latest development creating waves in the food market is plant-based meat alternatives.
With four times more vegans now than there were four years ago, veganism is having a moment in the UK. Data says that vegans and vegetarians could make up a quarter of the British population by 2025.
According to the recently-released figures in Science of the Total Environment, the proportion of Britons eating and drinking plant-based alternative foods (PBAFs) such as plant-based milk, vegan sausages and vegetable burgers have “nearly doubled” between 2008-2011 and 2017-2019, from 6.7 percent to 13.1 percent.
Similar observations were echoed by PETA which claims that the past five years have been “monumental”.
“The past five years have been monumental for the vegan movement. Interest in animal-friendly foods has skyrocketed as more and more people are looking for healthier options that are better for the environment and that no one has to suffer or die for,” Dr Carys Bennett, Senior Corporate Projects Liaison, at PETA, told Asian Trader.
About 7.2 million Britons currently follow a meat-free diet, says another market report. Going meatless is gaining momentum each passing day.
No wonder that sale of meat-free foods have grown an impressive 40 per cent from £582 million in 2014 to an estimated £816 million in 2019, says recent data from Mintel. Such is the popularity of meat-free food that sales are expected to be in excess of £1.1 billion by 2024.
The Vegan Society cites the Smart Protein Project (which uses Nielsen data) to state that the sales value of plant-based foods grew 73 per cent in the UK between 2018 and 2020 and “plant-based meats are helping to drive this category forward”.
Store owner Alpesh Shingadia, who stocks a wide vegan range in his Budgens store in Southwater, reveals that he has seen a spike in the demand for vegan meats in the last few years.
“I see an uptick in the demand for plant-based meats and proteins. To cater to the constant demand, we now have a dedicated space in the store for these foods,” Shingadia told Asian Trader.
Similar sentiments were echoed by Kirtan Patel, the owner of Londis Ferme Park Road store in Finsbury Park in London.
“In our chiller, we have about two and a half meters of just vegan foods. And then throughout the rest of the shop, whether it is biscuits, or food to go, we stock vegan sausage rolls, vegan biscuits, gluten-free biscuits. We even stock gluten free mince pies …”, said Patel, winner of the Independent Retailer of the Year accolade at this year’s Asian Trader Awards.
Clearly, it is time every retailer and store owner shuffle and make more space for plant-based meats in their store, making sure to stock the best-selling brands in their freezer section to cater to the changing needs of the ever-evolving Britons.
What is plant-based meat?
Veggie meat or vegan meat may be the latest buzz word but interestingly, it goes back to the late 1800s when US-based nutritionist and health activist John Harvey Kellogg developed the peanut-based & meatless meat & called Nuttose.
In simple, plant-based meat is a term that is used to describe foods that mimic meat products but are made from plants. Most of the time, plant-based alternative foods (PBAFs) tend to use soya or soya beans as their base – think tofu, tempeh – but one can also find meat alternatives made from fruit and vegetables like jackfruit or mushrooms or more recently, peas.
Coming in the form of nuggets, sausages, burger patties, and much more, PBAFs are created and manufactured to appear, feel, and taste like conventional meat. Some companies even claim that it offers the same cooking and eating experience as of traditional animal meat. Health, environmental concerns and ethical beliefs are the prime factors pushing the rise in popularity.
Since animal-based meats, especially red meats, were feared to be a cause of diseases such as obesity, type-2 diabetes, heart ailments and certain cancers, plant-based meats are now touted as a healthier choice owing to lower amounts of saturated fat and higher amounts of fibre.
Another major factor is the environmental. Half of British consumers overall (48 per cent) believe reducing consumption of animal products is a good way to lessen humanity’s impact on the environment, says Mintel data.
“Large numbers of Brits say they are removing or reducing the amount of animal products in their diets – whether that is for animal rights, environmental concerns or personal health,” Francine Jordan from The Vegan Society told Asian Trader. She calls for more government help to support a shift towards more sustainable diets.
“Amongst many other initiatives, we propose government backed funding to support research and development in crop production (such as lentils and chickpeas), and campaigns that show vegan diets can be 100 per cent healthy and nutritionally adequate.”
As storeowner Shingadia pointed out, shoppers are aware and are consciously making healthier choices, drifting towards products that they see as environment friendly. Going for plant-based meats over traditional range is one such lifestyle change shoppers are making: “They know exactly what they want when they enter the store”, he said.
Overall, there is a strong “feel good” factor associated with plant-based meats. Especially after battling Covid-19, people are now paying closer attention to their diet and increasingly adopting “flexitarian” diets – cutting down on meat and dairy while eating more plant-based foods.Documentaries, news coverage and celebrity influencers are acting as further catalysts in this movement which, interestingly, is largely driven by younger generations.
Must-stock Brands
As the number of vegans in the UK continues to spike, it is no wonder many businesses – big and small – are moving into the plant-based meat industry to tap into this booming market.
The Linda McCartney range of vegetarian and vegan products has been manufactured since 1991 and that makes it the oldest plant-based meat company in the UK. The brand is still doing well and is very well imprinted on shoppers’ minds.
Businesses excelling in this space seem to be innovative, with imaginative marketing campaigns and creative branding inducing clever play of words.
THIS is one such brand, which is also seen as the UK's best-selling alternatives to chicken and bacon, and whose products are said to mimic meat in taste, texture, appearance and even smell.
Heura is another brand which claims to make super-realistic chicken alternatives in two versions – chunks and strips. Made from soy, olive oil, salt, and spices sourced in Europe, Heura’s product is one of the healthiest options available on the market owing to a short list of ingredients and high nutritional value.
Quorn is by far and away the most well-known vegetarian/vegan food brand with about 50 per cent of respondents in a recent survey by Attest mentioning Quorn on being asked to name meatless meat brands. Fillets, fajita strips, burgers, smoky ham, chicken slices – Quorn most likely has every possible vegan option.
US brand Beyond Meat has also been a winner and game-changer when it comes to innovation in realistic imitation meat. Their “bleeding” burgers arrived in the UK in 2018 and are now available in most of the stores and are quite a hit among foodies. Attest also claims that most UK consumers are most likely to have tried Beyond Meat and enjoys a good brand loyalty.
VBites also has plenty to offer. The vegan company has been dishing out beef, chicken, pork, lamb, and turkey made from plants for over two decades.
Other noteworthy ones in this market are Meatless Farm, Vivera and Heck. Dutch brand Vivera has recently announced a £25 million investment to double the size of their production facility.
Unilever has also been expanding its plant-based meat and dairy alternatives business for several years. Its brand, The Vegetarian Butcher, offers plenty of vegan options including vegan mince, chicken shawarma, smoked sausage, and teriyaki chicken.
What the future holds
Apart from the current brands, constant research and development in this area is ongoing, giving rise to newer ranges and even newer brands each day.
According to Mintel, almost a quarter (23 per cent) of all new UK food product launches in 2019 were labelled as vegan, compared to just 17 per cent in 2018. With more and more Britons developing a taste for meatless meat, the market of plant-based brands is evidently hotting up.
"Leading companies are making significant investments to help shift their strategy towards plant-based for the long term, while more start-ups are striving to repeat the success of Beyond Meat. We are also seeing investment funds placing greater emphasis on plant-based innovation, which should enable even greater growth in 2022 and beyond,” Jimmy Pierson, Director- ProVeg UK, told Asian Trader.
UK based Atura Proteins also highlighted in a recent interesting survey that 56 per cent of UK’s food companies are likely to invest in plant-based products in 2022, with 41 per cent believing that vegan meats such as mince will be the biggest growing category in the plant-based space.
Social facilitation and beliefs about the importance of meat in the diet are still seen as barriers in plant-based foods becoming a part of the staple UK diet. While the meat-free market is thriving, a market report claims that 38 percent of non-users would prefer to substitute meat with other ingredients such as cheese or pulses, rather than buy meat substitutes.
Price is another major restraining factor in the meatless meat market. Plant-based meat is uneconomical when compared to animal-based meat, which is likely to impact its growth in price-sensitive markets. The prices of plant-based meat products are further expected to increase due to trade barriers, disruptions in the supply of raw materials, and inefficient distribution channels due to Covid-19.
To counter that, many stores and supermarkets are now trying to lower their prices. Both Tesco and Co-op have reduced the price of their vegan products in order to make them accessible to more people, and the launch of Co-op’s GRO vegan range in Nisa stores has been helping boost its frozen-food sales.
The segment holds promise of huge untapped sales potential, food firms are constantly experimenting to find the right taste and texture to ride on this wave.
After soy, pea-based PBAFs are emerging as a popular choice. Since pea serves as an alternative for consumers with a soy allergy it seems more appealing and is perceived as a clean-label ingredient with added benefits of being soy-free, gluten-free, and lactose-free.
Among the products, burger patties have dominated the market in past years and the same trend is projected to follow as well due to faster production, taste, convenience, and abundance in supply.
Vegan seafood is another new kid on the block.
“We are now seeing attention turned to vegan “seafood” – with vegan tuna, fish fingers, “shrimp” and sushi increasingly available on the market,” informed Jordan from The Vegan Society.
“With increased innovation happening in the category, costs are also coming down and taste/texture profiles are improving. Many high street retailers and food-to-go operators are now offering these once niche products. With this in mind, we expect this category to explode in the coming years.”
Vegan seafood is definitely the new buzzword with exciting new options like vegan fish cakes, plant-based scampi, fish-free tuna, and “fish” fingers, which are expected to propel huge sales in the coming times.
“People around the world are rethinking their eating habits after the hit Netflix documentary Seaspiracy exposed that sustainable fishing is a myth and that the oceans are on the brink of ecological collapse because of the relentless killing of fish and other marine animal,” said Bennett from PETA, who vouch for “Wagamama’s vegan chilli squid made from mushrooms, which won a 2021 PETA Vegan Food Award”.
It’s a wrap
Well, the shift is happening and the change here is definitely led by demand. With meat consumption in the UK dropping by 17 per cent from 2009 to 2019, as per PETA, vegan-meat consumption will definitely surge in the coming times.
Alpesh Shingadia, however, advises retailers to know their customers well- their demographics, their priorities and preferences- and try to stock the range accordingly since the demand and sales may also vary depending on locations and local population.
While some retailers stock plant-based options in a separate section, most often in a “healthier for you” area, some of the creators of vegan and plant-based alternatives to animal-based food products across the pond are encouraging retailers to sell their range in the meat case, or alongside meat products in the frozen section.
Their logic is that shoppers should be offered plant-based options right where they are seeking proteins.
While placement may vary, it is high time to green-sweep the grocery store and make some space for a wide and good range of bestselling brands of plant-based meat alternatives.
Any convenience store that is not or insufficiently stocking plant-based meats may end up losing majorly on potential shoppers, who might just consider moving to “greener” pastures!
In addition to announcing six brand new members within the first week of January, the new buying group The Wholesale Group last week hosted two briefing events for senior suppliers where it shared details of its plans and future vision.
The senior supplier briefing event, held at Soho Hotel, London last week, saw more than 50 channel directors in attendance plus 150 representatives from leading FMCG suppliers, across all product categories.
Joint managing directors Jess Douglas and Tom Gittins introduced the new group, outlining the rationale for its creation and the group’s USP:
“We all know the wholesale landscape is changing and we recognise the need to change with it to ensure we provide the best support and value for both independent wholesalers and our supplier partners,” said Douglas.
“As a result, The Wholesale Group has been created to provide the home for independent wholesalers, of all sizes, with extensive retail and foodservice expertise and support. This also provides our supplier partners with a highly-effective, cost-efficient route to market for independent caterers and retailers.
“And of course, our major USP is that there is no charge to join the group as a member, and all members receive a share of the profits.”
Gittins outlined the group’s strategic pillars, including central distribution and its central payment solution, described as a ‘win win’ for both wholesalers and suppliers.
“While The Wholesale Group can support every retail and foodservice business in every postcode, we provide one Group invoice and one Group payment, which will save considerable time and money for suppliers and members alike. It’s the ultimate win win.”
He also outlined some of The Wholesale Group’s innovative tech initiatives, including how both members and suppliers can utilise data and insight.
TWC’s Tanya Pepin shared updates on Insight, while Cerve’s David Walker and Nestle Professional’s Martin Robinson discussed how the Accelerate platform benefitted suppliers.
Illan Hepworth from ShopAI provided an introduction to The Wholesale Group’s brand new AI tool, which will launch later this year. This will provide members, suppliers and The Wholesale Group team with the opportunity to utilise AI in order to simplify how data and insight is accessed and understood, resulting in real-time accuracy of data and significant time savings.
Attendees also heard from co-chairs Coral Rose and Martin Williams, as well as an overview from Lumina Intelligence MD Jill Livesey.
“It was a fantastic day and we’re absolutely delighted with how our plans were received,” said Gittins. “Feedback from suppliers has been overwhelmingly positive and there is a real buzz around our plans for the future.
"As well as existing suppliers, we also saw a number of brands we haven’t previously engaged with which has prompted countless new conversations. It’s a really exciting time.”
Promoting safer alternatives to cigarettes could save 19 million years of life by 2030 and reduce smoking-related costs to taxpayers by up to £12.6 billion annually, a new report from the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) has revealed.
The think tank argues that the UK government's current approach to achieving a Smoke Free 2030 - defined as reducing smoking rates to 5 per cent or lower - is both illiberal and unworkable and will significantly set back progress against smoking related harm. The ASI warns that policies such as a generational tobacco ban, a new tax on vapes, and restrictions on heated tobacco products and flavours will hinder harm reduction efforts.
According to the report, outright bans in other countries have failed, and a generational tobacco ban in the UK could lead to unintended consequences, including fuelling black markets, as seen in Australia and South Africa. The proposed vape tax and the ban on disposable vapes are expected to deter smokers from switching to safer alternatives, with research suggesting that 29 per cent of disposable e-cigarette users might return to smoking if the ban is implemented.
“The evidence is overwhelming - tobacco harm reduction (THR) products reduce smoking-rates and save lives. Alongside scrapping the generational ban, the government must urgently reconsider its punitive restrictions on harm reduction products,” Maxwell Marlow, director of research at the ASI and report co-author, said.
The ASI advocates for policies that embrace market-driven harm reduction strategies, drawing inspiration from Sweden's success in becoming smoke-free through the widespread availability of reduced-risk products like snus. The think tank's key recommendations include:
Scrapping the Generational Smoking ban or at the very least carve out Type 1 heated tobacco products;
Reversing the ban on disposable e-cigarettes to prevent current users reverting to smoking;
Scrapping the vape tax, as this is likely to deter the uptake of refillable e-cigarettes as a long-term quitting aid;
Expanding access to THR products via pharmacies, hospitals and hospitality venue;
Legalising Swedish snus to provide consumers with a greater choice of reduced risk products;
Removing punitive restrictions on the marketing of reduced risk products and, instead, ensuring that advertising standards are properly enforced so as to not attract under-aged users;
Undertaking a wider public health campaign to counter disinformation surrounding reduced risk products, encouraging more smokers to make the switch.
If Smoke Free 2030 was achieved, we could save 19 million years of life in the UK. The figure reflects the cumulative increase in life expectancy for all smokers, adding up to 19 million years across the entire population. Research by Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) showed that smoking costs the UK taxpayer £21.8 billion annually. Based on ASH’s methodology, implementing the strategy outlined in the report could reduce this cost by between £9.2 billion and £12.6 billion, ASI added.
Several MPs have weighed in on the ASI's findings. Rupert Lowe, Reform UK MP for Great Yarmouth, warned against government overreach, stating, “This is a step towards government control over personal freedoms. It may start with smoking but it certainly will not stop there.”
Conservative MP Greg Smith echoed concerns about the feasibility of the generational ban, arguing that “the illiberalism of the generational smoking ban aside, there is no evidence to suggest it would even work.”
Labour MP Mary Glindon, who chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Responsible Vaping, however, supported the harm reduction strategy, saying, “The government is right to strengthen its commitment to a Smoke-Free 2030. By adopting a harm reduction strategy, we could save 19 million years of life while reducing the burden smoking-related harms place on the NHS.”
E-cigarettes are the most commonly used smoking cessation aid in England, associated with the highest success rates for quitting, a new study has found.
The study conducted by researchers from University College London as part of the long-running Smoking Toolkit Study analysed data from 25,094 participants aged 16 and older who attempted to quit smoking between 2006 and 2024.
The findings, published in JAMA Network Open, highlight that e-cigarettes have emerged as the most commonly used cessation aid, with 40.2 per cent of quit attempts in 2023-2024 involving their use. More importantly, their use was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of successful quitting, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95 after adjusting for various factors.
“This is consistent with evidence from randomized clinical trials and previous observational studies and provides further evidence that, in addition to being popular, e-cigarettes offer one of the most effective methods of quitting smoking,” the researchers said.
Despite their popularity and effectiveness, the study also revealed that a considerable proportion of quit attempts (40.8%) were made without any aid, which was associated with lower success rates.
While e-cigarettes topped the list, other aids that demonstrated positive associations with quit success were used far less frequently. These included:
Prescription nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): Used by 4.5 per cent of quitters (OR: 1.33)
Websites: Used by 4.6 per cent (OR: 1.43)
Varenicline: Used by 1.1 per cent (OR: 1.80)
Heated tobacco products (HTPs): Used by 0.7 per cent (OR: 2.37)
Interestingly, while prescription NRT showed a positive impact on quit success, over-the-counter NRT did not exhibit the same benefits (OR: 1.03). This discrepancy may indicate that guidance and structured support play a crucial role in the effective use of NRT products, the study noted.
Scottish convenience chain Greens Retail has raised an incredible £5,000 in support of Fife Gingerbread’s Heat & Eat appeal through Nisa’s Making a Difference Locally (MADL) charity.
The funds contributed significantly to the charity exceeding its £20,000 fundraising target, enabling it to provide critical support to families across Fife facing hardship.
The Heat & Eat Appeal aims to ensure children and young people live in safe, warm, and healthy homes during the challenging winter months, especially as the rising cost of living places added pressure on many households.
Greens Retail embraced this vital cause with fundraising initiatives in six of its Fife stores, where purchases of Co-op branded products contributed directly to the MADL fund. The campaign also received a boost from MADL’s Winter Warmer Award, which added an additional £1,000 to the total.
To further rally community support, Greens Retail produced a heartwarming Christmas advert featuring Fife Gingerbread’s mascot, Gingey, alongside local children.
The video, which highlighted the appeal, was viewed over 15,000 times on social media, garnering widespread engagement and support from the community.
Linsey Proctor, PR and Fundraising Representative at Fife Gingerbread, said: “We are blown away by the generosity of Greens Retail and their customers.
"This donation will directly fund emergency warmth and meals for vulnerable families. Greens Retail has shown the true power of businesses making a difference in their communities.”
Caroline Cunningham, Area Manager for Greens Retail, shared: “Our stores are at the heart of their communities, and this campaign demonstrated how we can come together to support a cause that truly matters. The impact of this donation is incredibly rewarding, and I’m proud of our team and customers for their generosity.”
Alexandra Copeland, Group Operations Director at Glenshire Group, added: “This achievement reflects the shared commitment of Greens Retail and Nisa’s MADL charity to community engagement. The passion and dedication behind this campaign exemplify how we can create meaningful change together.”
Calorie labelling of food on menus and products leads people to choose slightly fewer calories, a new Cochrane review has found.
For the study, published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the researchers examined evidence from 25 studies on the impact of calorie labelling on food selection and consumption.
They found that calorie labels in supermarkets, restaurants and other food outlets led to a small reduction in the calories people selected and purchased. The average reduction was 1.8 per cent, which would equate to 11 calories in a 600 calorie meal – or around two almonds.
Small daily changes in energy consumption can have meaningful effects if sustained long-term, and most adults tend to gain weight as they age. A UK government report estimated that 90 per cent of 20-40 year olds in England will gain up to 9kg over 10 years, and that reducing daily energy intake by 24 calories per day – roughly 1 per cent of the recommended intake for adults – would prevent this increase.
“Our review suggests that calorie labelling leads to a modest reduction in the calories people purchase and consume,” Senior author Dr Gareth Hollands (IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education & Society and University of Cambridge) said.
“This may have some impact on health at the population level, but calorie labelling is certainly no silver bullet. Our previous version of this review from 2018 reported a potentially larger effect but was inconclusive because there was significant uncertainty over the results. This update has reduced that uncertainty, and we can now say with confidence that there is very likely a real, albeit modest, effect.”
The new update compiled by researchers at UCL, Bath Spa University, the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford, used evidence from 25 studies with a strong emphasis on real-world field settings, with 16 of the studies being conducted in restaurants, cafeterias, and supermarkets.
The studies that were analysed encompassed over 10,000 participants from high-income countries including Canada, France, the UK to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Lead author, Dr Natasha Clarke (Bath Spa University), said: “This review strengthens the evidence that calorie labelling can lead to small but consistent reductions in calorie selection.
“While the overall impact on individual meals or food purchases may be modest, the evidence is robust.
“The cumulative effect at a population level could make a meaningful contribution to public health, especially as calorie labelling becomes more widespread.”
While calorie labelling shows promise, concerns remain about its possible impact on people at risk of disordered eating. The review noted a lack of data in the included studies on possible harms, including mental health impacts, and the authors recommend future research to assess this.
Dr Hollands said: “Calorie labelling to reduce the calories that people consume remains somewhat contentious, both in terms of whether it has any effect, and whether potential benefits outweigh potential risks or harms.
“We can now say with considerable confidence that it does have a small but potentially meaningful effect on people’s food choices. Labelling may therefore have a useful role, ideally alongside a broader set of approaches that place more onus on industry rather than individuals, such as taxes, marketing restrictions and reformulation. However, we should not expect miracles, and any implementation of calorie labelling must balance the many potential positive and negative impacts of such policies.”