Giving a mixed welcome to Tobacco and Vapes Bill introduced in the parliament today (5), trade association for the UK vaping industry Independent British Vape Trade Association (IBVTA) has highlighted the need to balance restricting access of vaping to young people with ensuring adults who smoke can access the most popular and effective tool for quitting.
The Bill introduced in Parliament today (5) comes after separate legislation that will ban single use vapes from June next year. A further announcement that liquid used in refillable vapes and prefilled pods will be subject to a duty of £2.20 per 10ml came in the Autumn Budget last week.
As well as banning the sale of tobacco products to anyone aged 15 or younger this year, the Tobacco and Vapes Bill carries over other elements of similar plans from the last Conservative government. The previous Bill ran out of time and fell before the general election.
This sits alongside a ban in the new Bill on vape advertising and sponsorship, as well as powers to restrict the flavours, display and packaging of all types of vapes, as well as other nicotine products.
Additional new measures from the Labour government include powers to extend the indoor smoking ban to specific outdoor spaces: with children’s playgrounds, outside schools and hospitals all being considered, subject to consultation. Wes Streeting is also considering including vaping within the smoking ban in some indoor spaces.
The Bill will also include powers to introduce a licensing scheme for retailers to sell tobacco, vape and nicotine products in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and will introduce on the spot fines of £200 to retailers found to be selling these products to people underage.
Chair of the Independent British Vape Trade Association, Marcus Saxton, said, “There are things to be welcomed in this Bill, such as strengthened powers of enforcement against retailers who engage in illegal sales. However, there is also a danger that with so many legislative avenues being sought to reduce youth uptake of vaping, ‘regulatory overkill’ may hamper the future of vaping as the UK’s leading quit aid for adults.
“The IBVTA looks forward to working positively and progressively with the Government to ensure that vaping becomes less accessible and desirable to children, and to adults that would not otherwise be smoking. However, this can only be considered successful in the context of continuing the decline in adult smoking rates that has accompanied the growth of the UK’s vape sector.
“Excessive restrictions on the types of products that our members can provide may reduce the products’ appeal. Even worse, they may contribute to continued misperceptions about the harm of vaping relative to tobacco smoking. Specifically, the role of flavours in supporting adult smokers to a successful quit attempt is accepted and understood by most public health stakeholders, and we believe to have been fundamental to the success of vaping in reducing smoking rates. Therefore, any reference to potential powers to restrict flavours is very worrying, as it threatens the government’s own goal of the UK becoming smoke free by 2030.
“It is vital that more smokers understand that switching to vaping is of much lower harm, and can help them to quit smoking for good.”
In addition to announcing six brand new members within the first week of January, the new buying group The Wholesale Group last week hosted two briefing events for senior suppliers where it shared details of its plans and future vision.
The senior supplier briefing event, held at Soho Hotel, London last week, saw more than 50 channel directors in attendance plus 150 representatives from leading FMCG suppliers, across all product categories.
Joint managing directors Jess Douglas and Tom Gittins introduced the new group, outlining the rationale for its creation and the group’s USP:
“We all know the wholesale landscape is changing and we recognise the need to change with it to ensure we provide the best support and value for both independent wholesalers and our supplier partners,” said Douglas.
“As a result, The Wholesale Group has been created to provide the home for independent wholesalers, of all sizes, with extensive retail and foodservice expertise and support. This also provides our supplier partners with a highly-effective, cost-efficient route to market for independent caterers and retailers.
“And of course, our major USP is that there is no charge to join the group as a member, and all members receive a share of the profits.”
Gittins outlined the group’s strategic pillars, including central distribution and its central payment solution, described as a ‘win win’ for both wholesalers and suppliers.
“While The Wholesale Group can support every retail and foodservice business in every postcode, we provide one Group invoice and one Group payment, which will save considerable time and money for suppliers and members alike. It’s the ultimate win win.”
He also outlined some of The Wholesale Group’s innovative tech initiatives, including how both members and suppliers can utilise data and insight.
TWC’s Tanya Pepin shared updates on Insight, while Cerve’s David Walker and Nestle Professional’s Martin Robinson discussed how the Accelerate platform benefitted suppliers.
Illan Hepworth from ShopAI provided an introduction to The Wholesale Group’s brand new AI tool, which will launch later this year. This will provide members, suppliers and The Wholesale Group team with the opportunity to utilise AI in order to simplify how data and insight is accessed and understood, resulting in real-time accuracy of data and significant time savings.
Attendees also heard from co-chairs Coral Rose and Martin Williams, as well as an overview from Lumina Intelligence MD Jill Livesey.
“It was a fantastic day and we’re absolutely delighted with how our plans were received,” said Gittins. “Feedback from suppliers has been overwhelmingly positive and there is a real buzz around our plans for the future.
"As well as existing suppliers, we also saw a number of brands we haven’t previously engaged with which has prompted countless new conversations. It’s a really exciting time.”
Promoting safer alternatives to cigarettes could save 19 million years of life by 2030 and reduce smoking-related costs to taxpayers by up to £12.6 billion annually, a new report from the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) has revealed.
The think tank argues that the UK government's current approach to achieving a Smoke Free 2030 - defined as reducing smoking rates to 5 per cent or lower - is both illiberal and unworkable and will significantly set back progress against smoking related harm. The ASI warns that policies such as a generational tobacco ban, a new tax on vapes, and restrictions on heated tobacco products and flavours will hinder harm reduction efforts.
According to the report, outright bans in other countries have failed, and a generational tobacco ban in the UK could lead to unintended consequences, including fuelling black markets, as seen in Australia and South Africa. The proposed vape tax and the ban on disposable vapes are expected to deter smokers from switching to safer alternatives, with research suggesting that 29 per cent of disposable e-cigarette users might return to smoking if the ban is implemented.
“The evidence is overwhelming - tobacco harm reduction (THR) products reduce smoking-rates and save lives. Alongside scrapping the generational ban, the government must urgently reconsider its punitive restrictions on harm reduction products,” Maxwell Marlow, director of research at the ASI and report co-author, said.
The ASI advocates for policies that embrace market-driven harm reduction strategies, drawing inspiration from Sweden's success in becoming smoke-free through the widespread availability of reduced-risk products like snus. The think tank's key recommendations include:
Scrapping the Generational Smoking ban or at the very least carve out Type 1 heated tobacco products;
Reversing the ban on disposable e-cigarettes to prevent current users reverting to smoking;
Scrapping the vape tax, as this is likely to deter the uptake of refillable e-cigarettes as a long-term quitting aid;
Expanding access to THR products via pharmacies, hospitals and hospitality venue;
Legalising Swedish snus to provide consumers with a greater choice of reduced risk products;
Removing punitive restrictions on the marketing of reduced risk products and, instead, ensuring that advertising standards are properly enforced so as to not attract under-aged users;
Undertaking a wider public health campaign to counter disinformation surrounding reduced risk products, encouraging more smokers to make the switch.
If Smoke Free 2030 was achieved, we could save 19 million years of life in the UK. The figure reflects the cumulative increase in life expectancy for all smokers, adding up to 19 million years across the entire population. Research by Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) showed that smoking costs the UK taxpayer £21.8 billion annually. Based on ASH’s methodology, implementing the strategy outlined in the report could reduce this cost by between £9.2 billion and £12.6 billion, ASI added.
Several MPs have weighed in on the ASI's findings. Rupert Lowe, Reform UK MP for Great Yarmouth, warned against government overreach, stating, “This is a step towards government control over personal freedoms. It may start with smoking but it certainly will not stop there.”
Conservative MP Greg Smith echoed concerns about the feasibility of the generational ban, arguing that “the illiberalism of the generational smoking ban aside, there is no evidence to suggest it would even work.”
Labour MP Mary Glindon, who chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Responsible Vaping, however, supported the harm reduction strategy, saying, “The government is right to strengthen its commitment to a Smoke-Free 2030. By adopting a harm reduction strategy, we could save 19 million years of life while reducing the burden smoking-related harms place on the NHS.”
E-cigarettes are the most commonly used smoking cessation aid in England, associated with the highest success rates for quitting, a new study has found.
The study conducted by researchers from University College London as part of the long-running Smoking Toolkit Study analysed data from 25,094 participants aged 16 and older who attempted to quit smoking between 2006 and 2024.
The findings, published in JAMA Network Open, highlight that e-cigarettes have emerged as the most commonly used cessation aid, with 40.2 per cent of quit attempts in 2023-2024 involving their use. More importantly, their use was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of successful quitting, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95 after adjusting for various factors.
“This is consistent with evidence from randomized clinical trials and previous observational studies and provides further evidence that, in addition to being popular, e-cigarettes offer one of the most effective methods of quitting smoking,” the researchers said.
Despite their popularity and effectiveness, the study also revealed that a considerable proportion of quit attempts (40.8%) were made without any aid, which was associated with lower success rates.
While e-cigarettes topped the list, other aids that demonstrated positive associations with quit success were used far less frequently. These included:
Prescription nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): Used by 4.5 per cent of quitters (OR: 1.33)
Websites: Used by 4.6 per cent (OR: 1.43)
Varenicline: Used by 1.1 per cent (OR: 1.80)
Heated tobacco products (HTPs): Used by 0.7 per cent (OR: 2.37)
Interestingly, while prescription NRT showed a positive impact on quit success, over-the-counter NRT did not exhibit the same benefits (OR: 1.03). This discrepancy may indicate that guidance and structured support play a crucial role in the effective use of NRT products, the study noted.
Scottish convenience chain Greens Retail has raised an incredible £5,000 in support of Fife Gingerbread’s Heat & Eat appeal through Nisa’s Making a Difference Locally (MADL) charity.
The funds contributed significantly to the charity exceeding its £20,000 fundraising target, enabling it to provide critical support to families across Fife facing hardship.
The Heat & Eat Appeal aims to ensure children and young people live in safe, warm, and healthy homes during the challenging winter months, especially as the rising cost of living places added pressure on many households.
Greens Retail embraced this vital cause with fundraising initiatives in six of its Fife stores, where purchases of Co-op branded products contributed directly to the MADL fund. The campaign also received a boost from MADL’s Winter Warmer Award, which added an additional £1,000 to the total.
To further rally community support, Greens Retail produced a heartwarming Christmas advert featuring Fife Gingerbread’s mascot, Gingey, alongside local children.
The video, which highlighted the appeal, was viewed over 15,000 times on social media, garnering widespread engagement and support from the community.
Linsey Proctor, PR and Fundraising Representative at Fife Gingerbread, said: “We are blown away by the generosity of Greens Retail and their customers.
"This donation will directly fund emergency warmth and meals for vulnerable families. Greens Retail has shown the true power of businesses making a difference in their communities.”
Caroline Cunningham, Area Manager for Greens Retail, shared: “Our stores are at the heart of their communities, and this campaign demonstrated how we can come together to support a cause that truly matters. The impact of this donation is incredibly rewarding, and I’m proud of our team and customers for their generosity.”
Alexandra Copeland, Group Operations Director at Glenshire Group, added: “This achievement reflects the shared commitment of Greens Retail and Nisa’s MADL charity to community engagement. The passion and dedication behind this campaign exemplify how we can create meaningful change together.”
Calorie labelling of food on menus and products leads people to choose slightly fewer calories, a new Cochrane review has found.
For the study, published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the researchers examined evidence from 25 studies on the impact of calorie labelling on food selection and consumption.
They found that calorie labels in supermarkets, restaurants and other food outlets led to a small reduction in the calories people selected and purchased. The average reduction was 1.8 per cent, which would equate to 11 calories in a 600 calorie meal – or around two almonds.
Small daily changes in energy consumption can have meaningful effects if sustained long-term, and most adults tend to gain weight as they age. A UK government report estimated that 90 per cent of 20-40 year olds in England will gain up to 9kg over 10 years, and that reducing daily energy intake by 24 calories per day – roughly 1 per cent of the recommended intake for adults – would prevent this increase.
“Our review suggests that calorie labelling leads to a modest reduction in the calories people purchase and consume,” Senior author Dr Gareth Hollands (IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education & Society and University of Cambridge) said.
“This may have some impact on health at the population level, but calorie labelling is certainly no silver bullet. Our previous version of this review from 2018 reported a potentially larger effect but was inconclusive because there was significant uncertainty over the results. This update has reduced that uncertainty, and we can now say with confidence that there is very likely a real, albeit modest, effect.”
The new update compiled by researchers at UCL, Bath Spa University, the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford, used evidence from 25 studies with a strong emphasis on real-world field settings, with 16 of the studies being conducted in restaurants, cafeterias, and supermarkets.
The studies that were analysed encompassed over 10,000 participants from high-income countries including Canada, France, the UK to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Lead author, Dr Natasha Clarke (Bath Spa University), said: “This review strengthens the evidence that calorie labelling can lead to small but consistent reductions in calorie selection.
“While the overall impact on individual meals or food purchases may be modest, the evidence is robust.
“The cumulative effect at a population level could make a meaningful contribution to public health, especially as calorie labelling becomes more widespread.”
While calorie labelling shows promise, concerns remain about its possible impact on people at risk of disordered eating. The review noted a lack of data in the included studies on possible harms, including mental health impacts, and the authors recommend future research to assess this.
Dr Hollands said: “Calorie labelling to reduce the calories that people consume remains somewhat contentious, both in terms of whether it has any effect, and whether potential benefits outweigh potential risks or harms.
“We can now say with considerable confidence that it does have a small but potentially meaningful effect on people’s food choices. Labelling may therefore have a useful role, ideally alongside a broader set of approaches that place more onus on industry rather than individuals, such as taxes, marketing restrictions and reformulation. However, we should not expect miracles, and any implementation of calorie labelling must balance the many potential positive and negative impacts of such policies.”